51 WHY? “BUT WE NEVER TELL IFMNT” AND “WILL WAIT AND SEE IF ANY OTHER PROBLEMS ARISE.”
This document proves the malice and the madness.
Me and Sergeant Colin Wright on the evening of the above. 23/4/2010. Recorded conversation.
.Me……………..”Can you see the point that you should have warned me?” [That Poynter had warned the Police that he was about to discharge firearms near us]
Wright………..”I hear what you’re saying, the problem is if he’s shooting on his land (Within a stone’s throw of our boundary fence and less than 90 meters from our house), there’s no need to warn anybody else.”
Me……………..”And ricochets don’t matter? [Or shocking gunfire either?]
Wright………..”Well we don’t know that you’re on the back of your land do we?”
Me……………..”That’s the whole point, ring me, warn me, if he rings you to say he’s going to fire a shot, warn me so I’m not up the back and get accidentally shot.”
Wright………..”OK I hear what you’re saying and I’ll take that on board.
Me……………. “Nothing’ll happen though aye, It’ll happen again, I won’t be warned, I’ll never be warned.”
Wright………..”Just a moment, if you’re at the back of your land how will we be able to warn you, have you got a cell phone?”
Me………………”Yeah.”
Me………………”I want to be warned.”
Wright…………”If he’s shooting on his land and he phones us to say he’s doing that…………….
Me……………….”Prior, I want to be warned.”
Wright…………”You want a phone call to say that he’s doing that?”
Me………………”Before, so I don’t go up there.”
Wright…………”So what you’re saying is that you deserve a warning as well?”
Me………………”I deserve a warning because I am the person effected most.”
Wright………….What you’re saying is if he is going to do some shooting you want to be told about it as well.”
Me……………….Yeah prior, so I’ve got time to not go there or be warned so I don’t shit my pants when he fires it off. That’s fair enough isn’t it?”
Wright…………”I understand what you are saying and it is a fair point.”
(Grammarly says, “I see your point, and I agree that it’s a valid argument.”)
Me………………”Yeah good.”
Wright…………”Any other issues.”
Me………………”No.”
It was like I was talking to a retard.
And did their ’DO NOT WARN the Van Der Lubbes’ if Poynter rings to warn police that he is about to shoot policy change? Of course not, they want us to react, be shocked, or better still, shot.
It’s all quiet around here now, Poynter fucked off with some slut, and the former Mrs Poynter has refused the cops’ urgings to carry on where her pet-killer ex left off.
The Motivation. “We’ll Get Ya!” Uttered by an empty-handed/headed search warrant cop doing the walk of shame way back in 1984.
But according to Senior Sergeant Lance Kennedy of the Wanganui Police the above was not a police “policy”. What would you call it then Mr Kennedy?
The “WE” is the Police, as it’s a police communication transcript it couldn’t be anyone else?
“NEVER” On no account, in no way, by no means, not at all etc.
“TELL” Inform, advise, notify, enlighten, let know etc.
INFORMT” Jacobus van der Lubbe.
If it wasn’t, as you claim, police “policy” what was it?
An instruction?
A rule?
A strategy?
A plan?
A guiding principal?
A course of action?
Procedure?
A guideline?
A ruling?
An edict?
A diktat?
An understanding?
A tactic?
A line of attack?
An arrangement?
Nothing?
Which of those terms describes “WE NEVER TELL INFORMT” best?
Of Course, I Proved That One Wrong As Well. Fucking cops, I hate them all, McScumings and his cover-up brigade proved what sort of bent bastards they ALL are, and why certain unhinged victims of their Gestapo-like behaviour dream of getting even.
Jackinabox
Member
Jacko, c&p’s from your amusing website aren’t of any value.
So that’s the tactic, I’ll have to step it up a little.
“But from each crime are born bullets that will one day seek out in you where the heart lies.” Pablo Neruda
1 If it’s true, it would be the story of the year. weizguy. That from a Labour Party Parliamentary Staffer.
Bent Cops 