TEN FOOT TALL (lol) AND BULLET PROOF.

ANYWHERE, ANYTIME. I NEED A SLASH, WHO GIVES A BUGGER IF SOMEONE WALKS PAST.  http://www.stuff.co.nz/southland-times/news/72715994/toilet-stop-leads-to-indecency-charge

Three phone calls to Wanganui Noise Control permanently stopped Stephen Poynter’s ridiculously loud stereo provocations.

Untold phone calls followed up by untold letters to the Police about Stephen Poynter’s high-powered firearms misuse and other criminal offences and provocations fell on deaf ears and blind eyes. The conclusion must be that the NZ Police are knowingly and willingly aiding and abetting Stephen Poynter’s ongoing criminal offending.

One letter to the District Health Board about the Poynters’ illegally serving homekill beef and pork products to the residents of the Lady Joy Rest Home and the high-powered homekill gunshots are permanently stopped. Who would call the corrupt cops for anything? Not me that’s for certain!

Rest home warned over homekill beef

By Melissa Wishart

Jun 30, 2015

Lady Joy Rest Home in Aramoho has received an official warning for illegally serving homekilled meat to its residents.

Director Stephen Poynter told investigators he did not realise it was illegal, and his family had eaten the same meat.

Ministry of Primary Industries investigators visited the rest home on March 24 and found 78kg of bagged and frozen beef in a freezer, meat from a cattle beast that had been born and raised on the director’s property, then slaughtered and processed by a registered homekill operator.

The visit was sparked after an anonymous member of the public sent out a letter to the Whanganui District Health Board and the Wanganui Chronicle claiming the directors of the rest home were routinely serving homekill beef and pork products to their residents.

The letter writer pointed to parts of the Animal Products Act 1999 saying homekill product could not be provided as food to customers or paying guests.

Mr Poynter said the processing of the animals had now changed.

“The prime Hereford was owned by the residents at birth, born and raised at the rest home’s surrounding 30 acres and formed part of the recreational programme,” Mr Poynter told the Chronicle.

“The residents are able to continue to enjoy their own prime Hereford, processing is simply changed from the professional licensed homekilling company to Affco.”

A statement from the ministry said home-kill meat was not allowed to be served to residents as it was not inspected by a vet for disease, and consumers had no guarantee it had been processed hygienically.

“Although providing homekill meat to the rest home residents was illegal, the meat was processed correctly as homekill and then frozen prior to cooking, which considerably lessened the risk to those eating it,” the statement said.

“MPI issued an official warning to the rest home and the director involved and is undertaking a programme of unannounced food safety inspections …” ”

– Wanganui Chronicle

It’s not the warning but it’ll do.

“Director Stephen Poynter told investigators he did not realize it was illegal” He stored the meat away from the Lady Joy because he didn’t know what he was doing was illegal. Pull the other one.

WOULD YOU PUT YOUR LOVED ONES INTO THE CARE OF A PSYCHOPATHIC PISSHEAD?

 29/4/2014

SHOULD A PSYCHOPATHIC DRUG DEALING PISSHEAD BE THE HOLDER OF A FIREARMS LICENCE?

_________________________________________________________

IF YOU TELL LIES ABOUT ME, I’LL TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT YOU.

SUE ME FOR DEFAMATION IF IT’S NOT TRUE.

SILENCE IS CONSENT.

1

 

2 http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11568647

 

 

3 http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11568647

 

 

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11568647

 

If it wasn’t for the obvious paternal resemblance I’d have to conclude that the child endangering, brainless drongo was sired by someone other than the decent, long-suffering and thoroughly mortified former Wanganui Mayor Chas Poynter.

.

.http://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=11421018

Farm worker fined for dangerous quad bike use

14/05/2014

A Marlborough farm worker has been fined $15,000 for not wearing a helmet while riding a quad bike at work and carrying a helmetless child as a passenger.
It is believed to be the first time someone has been convicted for carrying a passenger on a work quad bike.
Herd manager Rangi Holmes was sentenced today at the Nelson District Court on two charges under the Health and Safety in Employment Act, for failing to take all practicable steps to ensure his own safety and that of his passenger.
Workplace safety regulator WorkSafe New Zealand took the prosecution after inspectors saw Holmes repeatedly riding a quad bike in the Rai Valley while carrying children, without a helmet.
Over the 20 months from February 2012 five such incidents were observed.
In August last year Holmes’ employer was issued a notice prohibiting the carrying of passengers on quad bikes and requiring the use of helmets.
Holmes was supplied with a copy of that notice, but in October he was again seen carrying a child on a quad bike. Neither he nor the child had on a helmet.
WorkSafe NZ’s general manager of health and safety operations, Ona de Rooy, said Holmes put his own life, and the lives of the children he carried as passengers, needlessly at risk.
“Quad bikes are inherently dangerous,” she said.
“On average five people are killed in quad bike accidents and another 850 are injured [each year]. They are not toys and need to be ridden with care.
“There was simply no excuse for Mr Holmes not wearing a helmet. Helmets were supplied at his workplace but he chose not to wear one. A helmet can be the difference between walking away from an accident and suffering a permanent, life-changing brain injury.”
De Rooy said quad bikes designed for one person should also not be used to carry passengers – particularly children in a work environment.
“Mr Holmes repeatedly showed reckless disregard for safety,” she said.
“He is lucky that WorkSafe NZ inspectors intervened before there was any accident.
“This case sends a clear message to quad bike riders – use your head, and wear a helmet.”

 

*

 

“A CALCULATING AND CONNIVING BULLY WHO SETS OUT TO DESTROY PEOPLE’S LIVES.”

.

On 13 March 2006, and without consulting or getting permission from any of his neighbours, STEPHEN POYNTER, a part owner of the LADY JOY REST HOME, began to exterminate the wild goats that lived on and about our neighbouring farmlets using a high-powered 243 rifle.  He fired his rifle onto and over properties that he did not own and also onto the steep bush land that belongs to another neighbour, Kevin Carr, but my wife and I legally occupy. When I confronted him about his outrageous behaviour he said, “Get used to it.”

4

X marks the spot from where Poynter shot at least 5 goats and the arrow points to my residence at the time.

Note the built up area in the background. I have since built a new house just to the right of the Lombardy poplar. (Bottom left)

5

6

7

8

These last two were shot about 20 meters below the Kevin Carr house. “The shots were awfully loud.”, Mrs Carr later told my brother in law who lives next door to her on upper Roberts Ave.

Poynter didn’t check if the goats he’d shot were in fact dead and not suffering a slow, painful death nor did he dispose of the carcases as is required. And he let any baby goats starve to death. He has since denied under oath shooting the above goats saying that he only shoots on his own land. All the pictured dead goats were on Carr land.

I let Poynter know at the time, and in no uncertain terms, that I was not at all pleased with his behaviour, the incredibly loud gunshots and the screaming of the wounded shot goats.

Had Poynter said, sorry, my bad, instead of “Get used to it,” I would not have reported the matter to the Police but as he was unrepentant and returned (with his kids) for another bomb-up the next evening, I contacted the cops. A Constable J Geurtjens of the Whanganui Police spoke to Poynter and warned him not to fire his 243 in a built up area again. Geurtjens Police notes read, “Poynter warned of offence + his actions, warning was accepted.”

.

Poynter much later stated under oath,

.

THE COURT (Judge David Cameron after Poynter refused to answer my cross-examination question.)

.

Q   So back to Mr Poynter, well do you recall any incident of shooting or do you recall when you first shot goats on or around or near your property Mr Poynter?

.

A.   Um, I’ve shot goats on my property yes.

.

Q.   But Mr Van Der Lubbe is trying to have you recall the first time you shot goats there. Do you recall that or not?

.

A.   Not really, no, no.  (He’d just finished telling the Crown Prosecutor all about it)

.

Q.   And just for completeness, did you see the necessity at any time to seek anyone’s else’s permission to shoot?

.

And then he contradicted his above claim of memory fade by telling the Judge the following.

.

A.   Um, no I was only, other than on my own land, um, ah, but I was contacted by the people above us, which is Catherine Carr and they said please, you know, shoot on our property as well if you wish to, um, and that was some time ago but didn’t, ah, I haven’t done so.

.

Q,   You have not done so?

.

A.   No, I haven’t done so, I’ve only shot on my own property.

.

AND THERE YOU HAVE IT, PERJURY IN A COURT OF LAW. 

9

Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.

.

   

Man sold drugs to police officer

Court Reporter |                         Friday, November 11, 2011 8:43

Wanganui District Court

A man has been jailed for three years after being caught selling cannabis oil to an undercover police officer as well as being found with almost 3kg of cannabis leaf. Paul Coleman, 36, appeared in Wanganui District Court and pleaded guilty to three counts of selling cannabis oil, three counts of offering to supply a class B drug, one count of offering to sell a class C drug, one count of offering to sell a class A drug, one count of manufacturing cannabis oil, one count of possession of cannabis oil for supply and possession of substances used in production. The charges relate to events spanning April 2010 to September 2010. Text messages sent and received by Coleman in April revealed he was offering to supply cannabis oil capsules and cannabis head. Texts in June showed Coleman offering to supply methamphetamine and asking an associate for small re-sealable plastic bags so he could break down a gram of methamphetamine into quarter-gram packets to sell. In September, police searched Coleman’s house and found a cardboard “capping box”, used to hold empty capsules for cannabis oil to be inserted into. The box contained two capsules of cannabis oil, and a knife and razor blades with cannabis oil on them were nearby. In a bedroom, police found a 15-litre bucket with two bags of dried cannabis leaf totalling 1.8kg inside. In the kitchen, five two-litre containers of isopropyl alcohol, used in the manufacture of cannabis oil, were found, with only one litre remaining. A further plastic bag containing more than 900g of cannabis leaf soaked in the alcohol was also found. In September, Whanganui police ran an undercover operation targeting people involved in the sale and supply of cannabis oil. An undercover officer purchased cannabis oil, sold in capsules of about 2ml for $40, from Coleman on a number of occasions. On two occasions, the officer watched Coleman make capsules up. A bit of déjà vu there Stephen. Greed and stupidity, what a combination! *

22

*

“I remember well my first experience with the then called PCA, (Police Complaints Authority) in 1998 when I was a cop. It was an absolute joke. Do you people realize that most of these complaints are actually investigated by fellow police officers that simply send a report to the Authority; the Authority has absolutely no idea of the credibility of the investigation. Anyway I witnessed this Sergeant assault a mentally slow young Maori boy in the police station. I then witnesses years of corrupt cover-ups, firstly by the PCA investigator, a Detective Sergeant (they were great mates) that worked in the same station, then by the now Assistant Commissioner Burgess, and finally by Police Professional Standards at Police National Headquarters. I also made a separate official complaint of assault against this police officer to the Detective that few years latter was the O/C of the Mark Lundy murder case, work that out. This police officer that assaulted this young Maori boy is now the Wanganui/Ruapehu Area Controller. In my experience adding the word “INDEPENDENT” to the title is nothing more than a sick joke played on the people of New Zealand.”

omand (1 )              9:07 pm, Sat 9 Nov #31

Homekill shooting victim ‘on brink of death’

Two quick questions, why didn’t you (the Wanganui Police) charge me with unlawful possession of a firearm when you had THREE written statements from three ‘creditable’ witnesses, S & S Poynter and T Robertson, all swearing that they had seen me with a rifle at my address on several occasions? And, why did you describe the thoroughly discredited Mansell memo as “legitimate” in your letter to me dated 14 July 2008? Yours faithfully J Van Der Lubbe

“The issue of fit and proper is based on convictions and or actions determined to question actions of normal prudent person”. Inspector Greg Hudson.

Then the gutless coward seals his fate by attempting to murder my cat!

Means, motive, opportunity, previous threats to do harm, a false alibi and an active police cover-up. What more do you need to prove a crime?

27 09 2010 “ You have no fucking idea who you’re dealing with boy, you’ve got no fucking idea, you wait, you wait, you cunt, i’ll fucking get ya, you fucking wait.”  The brave words of a pet cat shooter. SPCA chief executive Bob Kerridge said, “It is not unusual for people to use animals and threaten their partners or enemies and do things to animals as a way of getting back.” He said it was a cowardly act because the animals were defenseless. “When you add the vindictiveness to it, it is not only cowardly, it’s rather sickly.” http://www.nzherald.co.nz/crime/news/article.cfm?c_id=30&objectid=10790333

From the FABRICATED JOBSHEET dated 05-10-10 by Sergeant Colin Wright. “there was no evidence that the injury had been caused by a firearm.” “there were traces of metal in it [the shoulder wound] but this was not from a firearm.” So what plowed the straight furrow through the fur and left the metallic fragments in the shoulder wound if it wasn’t a fucking bullet? “A metal fence or similar”according to scumbag Colin Wright. Maybe poor puss was hit by a meteorite. Typical of the dirty cops to try and deflect the blame from one of their criminal abettors by proposing insane scenarios. . . Trapper’s Guide by S Newhouse. SHOOTING. “This method of killing fur bearing animals, is still quite prevalent in some countries. It is said to be the principle method in Russia, and is not altogether disused in this country. But it is a very wasteful method. Fur-dealers and manufacturers consider skins that have been shot, especially by the fowling-piece, as hardly worth working. The holes that are made in the skin, whether by shot or bullets, are but a small part of the damage done to it.

The shot that enter the body of the animal directly, are almost harmless compared with those that strike it obliquely, or graze across it. Everyone of these grazing shot, however small, cuts a furrow in the fur, sometimes several inches in length, shaving every hair in its course as with a razor.”

Pages 14 and 15 @%0     %A//www.scribd.com/doc/48779101/Trapper-s-Guide-Sewell-Newhouse-1887″>http://www.scribd.com/doc/48779101/Trapper-s-Guide-Sewell-Newhouse-1887 .

THE COPS ARE SO ADAMANT THERE IS “NO EVIDENCE” THE CAT WAS SHOT BECAUSE  THEY HAVE ALL THEY OTHERWISE NEED TO PROVE  POYNTER DID IT  AND THEIR “NO EVIDENCE” STANCE IS THE ONLY WAY LEFT TO COVER IT UP. 23 May 2011 Duncan MacLeod Inspector Police Station Wanganui Dear Sir, I put the attached question in person to Mr Barton this morning and he said that he did not say to Sergeant Wright “that there was no evidence that the cat had been shot” and he also said to me, “I didn’t say that it [the injury] was not from a firearm.” According to what Mr Barton said to me this morning your Sergeant Colin Wright has falsified the attached Jobsheet with the intent of obstructing justice. It is clear from OIA document 00017 that Constable R Smith’s decision to abandon all lines of enquiry in relation to my complaint regarding the shooting of my cat was directly influenced by Sergeant Wright’s falsified Jobsheet. One more thing, Stephen Poynter said in his 30/12/10 statement that he returned home from Wellington at 8.30pm on Sunday 26^th September 2010, I.E. three and a half hours before my cat came home seriously shot, so how your Constable Wakefield could possibly state in OIA document 00045  “but I am certain it was not shot by Poynter” is beyond me. Poynter, by his own admission, had ample time and opportunity to shoot my cat. His threat to “do things against me” is proven fact and his pattern of provocation and reckless/unlawful use of firearms is clear to anyone (Judge Clapham) who makes an unbiased examination of the evidence. I trust that you will make your own inquiries as to the veracity of Sergeant Wright’s attached Jobsheet. Yours faithfully, J Van Der Lubbe 22A Paterson Street, Wanganui. And guess who MacLeod got to do that “investigation”? None other than Inspector (the fixer) Greg Hudson, the spy/liar who darkened my doorway twice with false offers of help and then lied his head off about me to the IPCA. Notice how Hudson has dropped the word “metallic” or “metal”  from his notes, now it’s “only grit found in wound.” Hudson refused my Official Information Act request for a copy of the above notes and the Ombudsman backed him in his obstruction but in the end the Privacy Commissioner had a word with Police National Headquarters legal section and they overruled Hudson’s corrupt bullshit.

“Only real way to determine would be x ray to find whether or not any shrapnel left in wound.”  G Hudson.

“Metal fragments identified in R scapula area.”

I think that just about wraps it up don’t you?

*

13/10/10

.

Constable Raewyn Smith rang at about 1pm today and wanted to know if I would like to come in to the Police Station for an interview about an allegation that Poynter had made against me. I asked her what the allegation was but she refused to tell me. I then asked her if she was related to Sergeant Kevin Smith but she declined to comment. I then asked her if she had discovered who had shot my cat and she replied, “Allegedly shot.”

 So the NZ Police stance on this matter is that there is “no evidence” that Puss was even shot. So much for the bullet furrow linking the two wounds and the “metal fragments” that vet Genevieve (Poppy) Clement said she’d cut out of the shoulder wound. Why do you reckon the cops are in denial again? Why is it so important to the cops that puss was not shot? Smith also said that Poynter had provided “proof” that he was out-of-town at the time Puss sustained his “alleged” injuries so it can’t have been Poynter that did the dastardly deed if a dastardly deed was indeed done.

I then asked her again what Poynter’s latest allegation against me was and she reluctantly told me that he had claimed that I had “approached a fence” and “made a threatening gesture at him”. He “alleged” that I had “run my fingers across my throat” Tana Umunga style.

Taking a leaf out of Sergeant Kevin Smith’s book I told this latest Smith police person that I wasn’t going to “confirm or deny” the allegation. If she asks me again I’ll try another Smithism and say I “can’t remember” if I had or hadn’t indicated to Poynter that I intended to cut his throat for shooting my cat.

.

10/4/11

.

Sergeant Colin Wright rang at about 4.30pm today and asked if he could come round to speak to me about the “prehistoric” (6 months old) shooting of my cat. I said ok and he arrived at the deer gate about 15 minutes later. I went out and he immediately said that he didn’t want to talk about the cat business after all and launched into the matter of me allegedly threatening to cut Poynter’s throat. I replied, “It’s not about the cat then, you told a lie to me,” He denied lying to me and said, “No, no, it’s all to do with that.” And also, “Nothing’s going to be done about the cat being shot.” I then said, “I’ll leave you to it then because you’ve come here under false pretenses.” “I’ll just go and get a trespass notice for you, I won’t be a minute.” I’d typed it up as soon as I got the documents concerning the life endangering target shooting incident way back in June of 2010, I didn’t want that corrupt liar dealing with any of my complaints in future. He then shouted after me that he was giving me a warning for threatening the Poynters’, so I walked back to the gate and said to him, “You don’t warn me, that bastard shot my cat and you’re not going to warn me about anything.” (Again they’re too gutless to charge me, they know only too well what’s in store for them and the Poynters if they do, and where do they get off “warning” me for an unproven allegation?)

He then said that he had spoken to the vet and that there was no proof that the cat had been shot. That did it for me and I told him to get off the property under the Trespass Act. (This is the same low cop that accused me of being a potential justice perverter the very first time we met on 10/10/08) He refused to leave saying that he was entitled to come to my door. I told him he wasn’t and that our [driveway] wasn’t a public road. He then said, “Up to this point, (The deer gate that’s 130 meters inside the legal boundary), I’m entitled to be here.” I said, “No, this isn’t a public road.” He continued refusing to leave and kept up his entitlement crap some more so I asked him if he was a halfwit, but he continued to rave on like someone who simply won’t be told so I left him to it and walked back inside. A liar and a halfwit, well done Inspector Duncan MacLeod you certainly know how to pick the cops to send to my door. I’ve since issued Wright with a written trespass notice. (12/4/2011) Valid for 2 years. And why is it so crucial to the cops that my cat was not shot when they say they have proof that Poynter was out-of-town at the relevant times? If they had any brains at all they’d concede the obvious and admit that the cat had indeed been shot but that Poynter couldn’t have been the shooter because he had an alibi. Which leads to the conclusion that Poynter’s alibi is bogus and that their continued pig-headed stance that the cat was not shot is the only way the cops can protect Poynter from justice, but again they’re forgetting that there’s more than one way to skin a cat shooter. This latest denial of the bleeding obvious by this fool cop is further evidence that the supposedly withdrawn Mansell Memo is still being obeyed and that all that has gone on before has been corrupt practice.

 

After watching “The Siege” and the later police “true” version of the Napier events the other night I realised why Molenaar shot those three cops. Instead of getting the hell out of it when ordered to do so by Molenaar they puffed out their chests and half-wittedly proclaimed, “We’re entitled to be here.” The dumb sods were just asking to be shot.

.

17/5/11

.

Well it turns out that Poynter’s alibi is worthless because he told police (R Smith) that he was at home between “1830hrs” and midnight on Sunday 26/09/2010. So he had three dark hours to shoot my cat. No wonder the cops are so adamant that there is “no evidence that the injury had been caused by a firearm.”   (Colin Wright.)

Remember what Poynter said to me on 2/2/2007?  “You’ve got no f****n idea, you wait. You wait,you c**t. I’ll f****n get ya, you f****n wait. You say anything about me firing a weapon on my land, in rural land, well within my law and boundary. If you say anything or do anything against me, I will do things against you. You have no f****n idea who you’re dealing with boy. You don’t know who you’re toying with. You’ve got no f****n idea. You’ve got no f****n idea.”

Well he’s tried untold times to “do things against” me but he’s a loser, everything he’s tried to provoke me into sticking a pickaxe into his spinal column has been a dismal failure, he couldn’t even shoot my cat properly. . 26/6/11

.

REASONS TO CONVICT

His last minute denial that he knew of the cat’s existence, just like the belated addition of porky’s name to the alleged firearms sighting.

Means, 22 and 243.

Motive, to pay me back for proving him a liar on day one and putting him through the Court process. I saw him coming out of Brosnahan’s office wearing the look of a very beaten and depressed short-arse who’s just been told he’s right up shit creek. The exact opposite of the look he was wearing when I saw him coming  back from shooting the spotted deer. Only dopey Donald Britton is more obvious in his body language.

Opportunity, the several hours of darkness prior to the wounded cat coming home.

Mentality, psychopath.

Threats to do harm to me, on tape and irrefutable.

And an absolute confidence that the cops would cover-up for him should his crime be discovered. From Duncan MacLeod, Andrew McDonald, Colin Wright, Lance Kennedy, Drew Allison,  to Sean Jones et al they broke their police oaths and perverted the course of justice to protect Poynter from justice.

.

Anger over cat’s shooting

24/10/2014

Like every other night, Latte the cat crawled into bed with his owners. It was not until the morning that Emma Crookes noticed the blood.

“Latte was covered in blood and there was blood on the bed and he wasn’t moving.”

She described the scene on October 15 as horrendous.

Her first thought was that Latte, 7, had been hit by a car or attacked by a dog.

Feilding residents Crookes and her husband, Damian Crookes, said they were shocked when they learnt Latte had been shot, twice. Latte spent several days at the vets, where he was cleaned, X-rayed and monitored.

Damian Crookes said that after the initial panic, he was angry. “Once I knew he was going to be all right, I was just so angry that someone had put a bullet in my cat.”

Emma Crookes said the vets were worried about internal damage, and fluid and air in Latte’s lungs. She said they were worried they might lose him.

Damian Crookes said that as the couple did not have children, their three cats were like their babies.

The two slugs, which are hunting BB pellets, cannot be removed as that would cause more damage.

Police had investigated but the couple had been told there was not enough evidence for a prosecution.

The couple had contacted animal rights organisation Paw Justice. “They were just as disgusted as us,” Emma Crookes said.

The organisation had put up a $500 reward for information leading to a conviction.

Damian Crookes said the person needed to be caught. “There can’t be an idiot running around Feilding shooting harmless animals. What if this happens to someone else’s pet or a pellet ends up going through a child’s eye?”

Since the incident, he said, there was an obvious difference in Latte. He was more skittish and followed him around. He was also having restless sleep.

The couple said they had been overwhelmed with support from the community and they hoped somebody would come forward with information.

For the first time since March 06 Bonehead has decided to act normal.

This was left in our letterbox after about 4.30pm today.

Note that he didn’t sign it and that he’s still calling his killing area at the rear of suburban number 44 ”rural”. This note proves that he is well aware of  what is reasonable so when the shit finally hits the fan he won’t be able to plead otherwise. He drove along to his freshly dug burial pit with cattle beast offal in the bucket of his digger at 4.15pm. (27/6) No shot heard. The cops didn’t bother to warn me of the impending shot again but it looks like Poynter has learned his lesson at long last.

BONEHEAD SHOOTS FOUR OF MY DEER.

3/8/11 Well it’s all on again; Bonehead just couldn’t leave it alone, I guess that being a civilized member of society just isn’t his thing. After 9 months of peace and quiet the wife and I were woken by a moderated 243 shot, the first of four 243 shots that we heard round 10pm.  You don’t shoot possums or rabbits with a 243 when you own a 22. He had seen a number  (9) of straying VDL  deer in their middle and back paddocks that afternoon. Four shots were fired and there are five straying deer left so it looks like he was shooting my domestic animals again. He’s had TWO  final written warnings not to fire his 243 round here so there is no valid excuse for not revoking his firearms licence immediately. I phoned 111 and “Tom” the call taker, who admitted that he had heard at least two of the shots over the phone, said that Poynter had rung the Police earlier to warn them he was going to be doing some shooting . I told “Tom” that there was another shot pending, a disabling one. Can’t say I haven’t warned them!  I bet Poynter won’t allow/induce any of his livestock “stray” onto number 22A ever again. 23/08/11 ”The 1991  psychiatric report made it plain that Poynter looks for foolish, stupid and destructive releases when he’s subjected to abnormal stresses. i.e. he resorts to provocation, harassment, intimidation and animal killing when he doesn’t get his selfish way. In other words he’s a sociopath well on his way to becoming a psychopath. At around half past two Poynter or one of the home kill buffoons fired off an unsuppressed high-powered shot right by the rubbish dump. (A warned of and suppressed shot behind number 44 is no good to him now, he’s right back to where he left off just after he escaped justice back in 07) I rang 111 and was told that Poynter had phoned the Wanganui cops to warn them of the impending shot but as usual the stupid/criminal cops failed to warn us.

Bonehead proves once again that he is a justice perverter

18 8 2011 This morning Bonehead rode his quad up to his rubbish dump to where their pony was grazing, he roped the pony and walked it about 100 meters to as close as he could get to my anti rooster/gunshots/drunken antics noise device and then he took the rope off and tried to shoo the pony away to get video “proof” that my recorded gun noises were frightening the horses but the pony was having none of it; he reluctantly walked off a bit and began to graze. Bonehead then gave up trying to scare the pony, roped it, and tied it up near his house. He was going to show the cops his video “proof”

that his pony was being frightened by my defensive mechanism.

Curses! Another cunning plan foiled. Who now believes him when he said that I “lured” his cattle over onto number 22A or that the carry on of 10/12/08 wasn’t an  ”orchestrated scenario” ? .

When evil is “legal,” become a criminal.

“Of course, on a practical level, openly resisting the gang called ”government” is usually very hazardous to one’s health. But there is a big difference between obeying for the sake of self-preservation, which is often necessary and rational, and feeling a moral obligation to go along with whatever the ruling class wants to do to you, which is pathetic and insane. Most of the incomprehensible atrocities that have occurred throughout history were due in large part to the fact that most people answer “never” to the question of “When should you shoot a cop?” The correct answer is: When evil is “legal,” become a criminal. When oppression is enacted as “law,” become a “law-breaker.” When those violently victimizing the innocent have badges, become a cop-killer.” The next time you hear of a police officer being killed “in the line of duty,” take a moment to consider the very real possibility that maybe in that case, the “law enforcer” was the bad guy and the “cop killer” was the good guy. As it happens, that has been the case more often than not throughout human history. http://www.copblock.org/5475/when-should-you-shoot-a-cop/ . http://www.stephenfranks.co.nz/?p=109

.

Ecclesiastes 8:11, “Because sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily,  therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil.”

.

Bonehead wants his backyard back.

 

I received  this letter from SS Lance Kennedy and thought, (initially) at last, someone who might help rather that hinder.

19 September 2011 LB Kennedy Senior Sergeant Wanganui Police

Dear Sir, Thank you for your letter of 14 September 2011. Almost everything that has occurred between Stephen Poynter, myself and the Police since 13/3/2006 stems from Poynter’s fantasy (he’s not the full quid or fit and proper) that he can do as he pleases with firearms no matter who he endangers, upsets, annoys or impoverishes. I said “Almost” because there was another party involved in this disgraceful business and it was he that deliberately allowed this dangerous situation to continue for so long. Thank goodness he’s retired. If you genuinely want to resolve this matter Mr Kennedy all you have to do is forbid Poynter and his agents from discharging firearms within 200 meters of the adjoining Poynter/Van Der Lubbe boundary line. If Poynter wants Tony Hanna and his home kill crew to slaughter his pigs and cattle they can do it on the “rural” farmland that Poynter owns directly behind his Lady Joy Rest Home. Anyway, Poynter’s firearms licence should have been revoked the moment Sergeant Andrew McDonald, Sergeant Kevin Smith and Inspector Greg Hudson all admitted to me that they believed that Poynter sometimes discharged his unsuppressed 243 rifle to “annoy” or “bait” me. If Poynter’s guns had been seized back then my wife and I would have been spared untold stress, my life would not have been endangered by Poynter using right where I was sitting in our bush as his backdrop to a bit of target practice (24/4/10), my cat would not have suffered a serious bullet wound (26/9/10) and I’d still have my weed goats and all nine, instead of only five, of my recently escaped deer. (3/8/2011.) Yours faithfully Jack Van Der Lubbe 22A Paterson Street, Wanganui. I got no reply so I resent it on 27/10/11.

30 November 2011 LB KENNEDY SENIOR SERGEANT PATROL&RESPONSE WANGANUI. Dear Sir, Thank you for your letter of 8 November 2011. What was Mr Poynter’s response when you put my proposal of a 200-meter no firearm-discharging zone to him? Was it, ‘No, I don’t want to shock the shit out of the old folks at the Lady Joy Rest Home with unannounced high-powered home kill rifle shots.’? Yours faithfully, J Van Der Lubbe 22A Paterson Street, Wanganui.

So there you have it,  just like in the Mansell Memo, Kennedy is gleefully telling us that we are on our own and have to sort the matter ourselves. The cops got sick of Bonehead ringing them up all the time complaining about how I was serenading them whenever he or his equally stupid wife went near their pond so the deceitful Kennedy swung into action. He and Poynter got their heads together and hatched a plan that Poynter would promise not to fire any more shots near us but omitting to say that that undertaking would not apply to any of his agents like Hanna and Krs. It’s not hard to see why I call him Bonehead. That claim that Poynter refused to speak to Kennedy was a clumsy attempt to cover their tracks.

LANCE KENNEDY TODAY

And 17 years ago he was a Constable who falsified an official police document; who says crime doesn’t pay?   See page 19 Falsified Document.

Serious Breaches of the Police Code of Conduct:

• Knowingly falsifying a document or Police record(s) or knowingly making a false declaration or statement, including an incorrect record of attendeance or false explanation of an absence.

This is a tape recorder transcript of Kennedy or Sloss talking to Wanganui Comms after they drove past our place on their way back to town.

Male voice…10.3…(cop speak for free for another job)..Ahh…We’ll give you the result when we get a bit closer to town. Female voice…Roger. A little later…Female voice…Go ahead…(For some reason I didn’t hear the call in.) Male voice…Ahh…K3…(Code for no offence disclosed.) No harm…Ahhmm…One of them’s the farm manager like you said (O’Keefe) and the other ones a doctor at the hospital. (House surgeon Rob Shaw.) Forward the 101 (above) to me, I’ll fill it out and complete it. (By that he meant, leave the falsifying to me.) Female voice…Roger. You will notice on the above document (the 101) the words “ULTIMATE RESULT” and below them the words “No persons located”. Kennedy was a liar and perverter of justice then and in all probability he still is. .

THE SAGA CONTINUES.

On the 23^rd of February 2012 I laid a private “perjury” Information against cover-up merchant Sergeant Colin Wright and what do you know, 6 days later two cops arrive at my door with a couple of summonses for me. They charge that on the 3rd day of August 2011 I “threatened to do grievous bodily harm to Stephen Charles Poynter”, and that on the 23^rd day of August 2011 I “threatened to kill Stephen Charles Poynter” and they were signed off by none other than Lance” falsified document” Kennedy.

I asked the document server and OIC, a Sergeant Shawn Jones, when did you/the cops decide to lay the charges and he said, “December” (Just after Kennedy’s last letter wishing us a “quiet” and safe holiday no doubt).  I asked Jones why it took till now (64 weeks after I first told Duncan MacLeod that I intended to take the law into my own hands if he continued to sit on his.) to lay them and he said that he was “away”. I told him that they were laid in retaliation to my charge against Colin Wright and he replied that he didn’t know anything about the Sergeant Wright business. Yeah right! The charge against Wright was thrown out by the way because I got one word wrong on the Information, which, according to the learned judge, made the Information a “nullity”. Funny, when a cop made the very same “mistake” in the charges against me it wasn’t a “nullity”. Go figure. The outcome (temporary) of that matter suited me because I can only handle one matter at a time. Too much thinking ain’t good for my poor little brain.

.

These are two of the documents that Hudson refused to supply to me saying they were private to Poynter.

 

 

“with the location so close to other residential properties.”  But everywhere else Poynter’s property is described as “rural”. MacLeod’s own words betray his duplicity. If he’s talking to the IPCA or his bosses in Wellington or Palmerston North the Poynter place is a  27 acre rural property, but when he’s trying to justify his instructions to Hanna the location is “so close to other residential properties”.

.

26 April 2012 S A Schwalger Detective Inspector Area Commander: Wanganui Dear Inspector Schwalger Thank you for sending me a copy of the previously withheld D A MacLeod 04 June 2010 warning letter to Stephen Poynter. It is absolutely clear from that letter that Mr Poynter has been instructed by a senior police officer to give me a written warning if he or his agents intend to use a high-powered firearm on his property at 26A Paterson Street. I have to tell you now that since Mr Poynter received that letter he has twice [that I know of] failed to warn me in writing or verbally of his intentions to discharge high-powered firearms on his property at 26A Paterson Street. The first occasion was at about 9.41pm on the 3^rd of August 2011 when he used his suppressed 243 to shoot four of my deer, [two ear tagged does and two untagged spikers], that had escaped from their enclosure and had then strayed onto his land earlier that day. Two of the four high-powered rifle shots can be clearly heard on the recording of my 111 call that evening and were also confirmed as having been heard by the call taker. The second time Mr Poynter ignored Mr MacLeod’s explicit instructions to give me a written warning was at about 2.38pm [‏‎2:35:52 p.m. to be precise] on the 23^rd of August 2011 when he or one of his home kill agents used an unsuppressed high-powered rifle to kill a domestic pig. [A Ms Loraine Beg also phoned the police to report hearing that shot.] Not only has Mr Poynter twice ignored Mr MacLeod’s explicit instructions to give me a written warning that he intended to discharge a high-powered firearm on his property he has also disregarded Mr MacLeod’s clearly stated advise in relation to his need to be safety conscious and to be aware of what is around and beyond his firing zone. I am alluding to Mr Poynter’s admission to police that he, without first asking for permission, used the rear of my wife’s land as a backdrop to his target shooting of the 23^rd of April 2010. If Mr Poynter had bothered to check his firing zone by calling out he would have discovered that I was sitting directly in his line of fire. Some of the shots of that incident can be heard on the recording of the 111 call I made while I was laying on the ground trying hard not to be hit by one or more of the 20 plus bullets he admitted firing. I dared not make my presence known to him after the shooting started for fear of being deliberately targeted by a person who had previously threatened to do me harm. Proof of the justifiable concern I had for my physical safety can be heard on the 111 call record. I’m not going to mention the shooting of my cat by Mr Poynter, [I’ve now got x-ray proof he was shot] as I didn’t actually see him do it. I trust you will revoke Mr Poynter’s firearms licence without further argument as he has proved beyond any reasonable doubt that he thinks he is above the law, that he twice deliberately failed to warn me in writing that he intended to use a high-powered rifle, that he has fired his high-powered rifle solely to annoy me [Inspector Greg Hudson’s memorandum of 11 March 2010], that he does not need to obey explicit police instructions to uses firearms safely or be mindful of the mental and physical welfare of his close neighbours while he is using firearms. Mr Stephen Charles Poynter is a not a fit and proper person to own or possess firearms and should have his firearms licence revoked without any further delay. Yours faithfully J Van Der Lubbe 22A Paterson Street, Wanganui. PS Had I been in possession of the withheld 4/6/2010 warning letter to Mr Poynter on or before 3/8/11 or had the Police not acted as though the warning letter had not been sent or behaved as though they had no intention of enforcing the warnings contained in it I would not have deemed it necessary to utter the contentious words of 3/8/11 and 23/8/11. I would have limited my comments to telling the call takers that Mr Poynter was again ignoring Inspector MacLeod’s explicit instructions by firing unannounced high-powered rifle shots in my family’s vicinity.

THE CROWN PROSECUTOR HARRY MALLALIEU ASKS POYNTER A FEW LEADING QUESTIONS. Q   Now if I could take you back to August of 2011, the first being the 3rd of August? . A   Hmm. . Q   Do you recall particular use of your firearm on that day? . A   No I don’t no, I’ve, you know, it doesn’t, that day to any other day is just a- . A   So you wouldn’t be able to tell us exactly what you were doing- . A   On that day? . Q   -shooting on that day? . A   No.    (FEIGNED MEMORY LOSS/BRAIN FADE AGAIN EVEN THOUGH HE READ HIS ABOVE STATEMENT WHILE HE WAS WAITING TO BE CALLED.) . Q   And what about the 23rd of August? . A   Ah, I think it says there that I was, that I would have rung the police and said what was happening so if I was – if there was being a home kill done with a pig then that’s what I would have been doing, yeah.   . Q   But you don’t specifically remember that date because-  (AND THERE YOU HAVE THE CROWN PROSECUTOR, A CORRUPT OFFICER OF THE COURT, CONTRADICTING POYNTER’S LAST ANSWER WHERE HE GAVE A FULL ACCOUNT OF WHAT OCCURRED THAT DAY AS HE READ IT FROM HIS ABOVE STATEMENT.) . A   Well, no. . Q   – a long time ago I suppose? (THE DIRTY CORRUPT BASTARD.) . A   A long time ago and they weren’t they were just a, just another occurrence. Another event.

*

DID YOU BURN RUBBER OR PLASTIC? ANSWER NO! TWO NEW FABRICATIONS He alleged that I had cut the head off his statue and pointed a video camera at his house. Note the head is on backwards and the camera is pointing away from his house and he won’t be able to produce a photo proving otherwise.

He also said that I had dobbed him in to CYPS and for once he wasn’t lying. Would you stay quiet if you saw him abusing/endangering his kids?

He denied burning rubber and plastic but here is the proof that he was lying.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/122627161/judge-baffled-as-former-senior-firefighter-fined-over-two-fires-in-one-

PROVEN PERJURY. NOT THAT ANYONE GIVES A FUCK.

“The truth is like a lion, you don’t have to defend it.  Let it loose, it will defend itself.”

.

Profile of the psychopath

LET’S TICK THE BOXES In a bid to unmask those with psychopathic tendencies and prevent crime, Canadian criminal psychologist and FBI adviser Robert D Hare created the Psychopathy Checklist in the early 1990s that remains the gold standard for reference.Its defined set of traits include impulsiveness,                      Psychiatrist’s diagnosis.superficial charm,                “Slimy blowhard”  Kevin Smith. grandiosity,                         “Do you know who you’re dealing with boy?” Himself.callousness,                          “Terrorized neighbours by shooting cat, deer,  goats                                                  and other animals without warnings.”manipulative,                        Sucked in Robertson, Hanna, Steele et al to lie for him.lack of remorse or guilt,       Still thinking of less obvious ways to provoke. Dump/etc.propensity to blame others,   Committed perjury to that effect. poor behavioural control,     Psychiatrist’s diagnosisEgocentric.                             His threats of retaliation if he didn’t get his way. That’s 9 TICKS out of a possible 9    DIAGNOSIS = A TOTAL BASTARD.       PROGNOSIS = DOG TUCKER! .

.

WERE HIS PARENTS BROTHER AND SISTER?

 

 

This ignoramus fired a 308 high-powered rifle shot right next to our boundary fence within 100 meters of our house and he did it without warning at the behest of  shitstirring bonehead Poynter. “I don’t give a rats arse about your disagreements with Poynter”.

 

 

What’s next, dead animals laying all over the place, “stolen” cattle on our place, false statements to Police? Talk about flogging a dead horse!

.

17 06

Two dumbarses this time, Anthony Hanna thought he’d give his 308 firing mate a bit of backup. More guns and ammo than a fella really needs to get the job done.

Fucking half-wits relying on me not losing the plot. Britton did it at Makirikiri and now we have Poynter and these two numskulls pushing their luck.

Unsuppressed 308 carbine.

The face of a infantile fuckwit! He just had to be in on it; a month ago, for the first time ever, (my wife asked him to) Hana rang me to warn me that the other dumbarse was going to do a home kill next day but when I asked him what calibre rifle was going to be used and he said a 308, I reminded him about the letter he had received from Duncan MacLeod that stipulated a supressed 243. He then said, “Look, I don’t give a rat’s arse about your argument with Poynter”, and he hung up. So that’s Mr Anthony Hanna for you, he doesn’t give a rat’s arse about his worker’s safety and judging by today’s performance, his own for that matter, and what for, some sort of misplaced loyalty to the slimy blowhard psychopath Stephen Charles Poynter or maybe it’s just a lack of a sense of self preservation (brains). Either way the childish drongo needs his head read.

If these wankers were anywhere near to being normal they wouldn’t go out of their way to try and antagonize the old Dutch bastard next door with their outrageous gunfire, no they’d be getting their heads together and figuring out a way to reduce the very real danger to all concerned. Something like, ‘Let’s buy a captive bolt gun, they don’t make much noise, do a humane job and don’t pose a danger to human life and limb, and a bonus would be that “old whiskers” will no longer be able to get his hands on our rifles.’  But no that would be too much to expect from these dull-witted lowlifes.

____________________

26/05/2014 …..but  posted on 14 6 14.

S/S Lance Kennedy

Wanganui Police

Bell Street,

Wanganui

Dear Sir,

At 2.30 pm on 21 05 2014 an unsuppressed high-powered rifle [probably a 308] was discharged in or by the steel cattle yards on my neighbour Stephen Poynter’s property. The yards are less than 70 meters from my home. The shot gave me a fright even though I was half expecting it. Home Kill boss Anthony Hanna, for the first time ever, had done the decent thing and phoned me the previous day to warn me that a home kill was going to take place on the Poynter property sometime during the next day. Compare that to the reprehensibly confrontational  “WE NEVER TELL INFMT” policy the NZ Police has in place. How could you possibly justify that (perverse) instruction?

Immediately after I heard the shot I drove down my drive and observed Anthony Hannas’ home kill truck parked out of view of my home behind Poynter’s house. It was obvious to me that the truck was parked there and not by the killing yards  because Poynter and the home kill guy (not Hanna himself) didn’t want to alert me to the imminent unsuppressed high-powered gunfire by driving the home kill truck along the boundary to the yards where I might see or hear it.

I then drove on to my letterbox and uplifted the attached note. The note was not there when I checked the box at my usual time of about midday. The notes presence in my letterbox and the wording on it leads me to believe that the conditions for suppressed firearms use imposed on Poynter and his agents by Inspector Duncan MacLeod, that you so arrogantly trashed, have been reinstated. That is all well and good except for the fact that Stephen Poynter is once again laughing at the deliberately obtuse police by only pretending to adhere to some of the Inspector’s “formal instructions”.

I’ll tell you what I’ll do Mr Kennedy, because the note says that Poynter informs the police of the impending gunfire, I will give you one last chance to do your duty to prevent crime and keep the peace, by instructing all police that any future firearms use warnings given to the police by Stephen Poynter must be passed on to me immediately, (my home phone number is 3437510 and cell phone numbers are 0278725905 or 02108132186) and also that you make sure that Stephen Poynter obeys all police instructions as stipulated in Inspector Duncan MacLeod’s letter to him dated 04 June 2010. Sergeant Shawn Jones passed on an imminent gunfire warning to me on the 19^th of September 2013 so it can be done and there is no valid or sensible reason for not doing it.

If you do not take the above simple and rational measures and Stephen Poynter or one of his agents shocks or endangers my health with unannounced and unsuppressed gunfire again I will instruct a lawyer to charge you with criminal nuisance.

Yours faithfully,

Jacobus van der Lubbe

22a Paterson Street,

Wanganui.

_________________

Oct 9 2014

to brigitte.windl., peter.marshall, mark.lillico, louise.beard

to Nicola

Dear Nicola Cranstoun.

 

I refrained from opening your email since I spotted it in my inbox a day or so ago as I wanted one of my sons to open it and tell me the news. But today at about 3.30pm my psychopathic neighbour Stephen (cat shooter) Poynter let off a  celebratory volley of quick succession semiautomatic gunfire and I then knew that the Court had dismissed my appeal.

 

Since September 1 ( Ashburton Massacre day) it has been blissful round here, no gunfire, no roaring motorbikes, no screaming kids, no shitstirring of any kind. Russell John Tully’s beastly behaviour gave my nutty neighbour’s wife  pause for thought (not him though, he’s mad) but unfortunately the thought has been quickly forgotten.

 

But now I fear that the mayhem is about to recommenced again. If it continues and escalates it will be as a direct result of the COA wrong decision to dismiss my appeal. I have no hesitation it adding the three COA judges to the ever increasing list of culprits that have empowered Stephen Poynter to continue with his death defying behaviour.

 

As I wrote this email Poynter fired off another 30 or so shots.

 

Who do I apply to for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court?

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Jacobus van der Lubbe.

 .

I WONDER WHAT “STOCK” HE WAS SHOOTING TODAY? MUST HAVE BEEN A MASIVE PILE OF MASSACRED “STOCK” LYING IN A MANGLED BLOODY HEAP AFTER THAT MAJOR BOMB-UP.

__________________

.

HERE THEY ARE ON THE 10th PLOTTING THEIR NEXT MOVE.

 

And sure as day follows night bonehead comes up with another cunning plan.

____________________________

12 10 14

STEPHEN (pet cat shooter) POYNTER  RANG THE COPS AND TOLD THEM THAT HE WAS ABOUT TO “RETIRE” PESTS, OF COURSE HE WAS LYING TO POLICE. HE WAS SHOOTING TO ANNOY AND PROVOKE ME AGAIN. WAY TO POISON YOUR SON’S MIND WITH YOUR PSYCHOPATHIC HATE  AND START HIM ON A LIFE OF CRIME STEPHEN!

NOTE the close supervision of his underage son!

The walk of shame, another cunning plan exposed. Another example of child abuse too no doubt.

_____________________________

14/10/2014

This note, dated 13.10.2014. was left in my letter box sometime between 11am and 12 midday today and at about 12.30 a cattle beast is shot about 80 meters from my home.

That’s the same rifle Anthony Hanna brought to the 17 6 2014 triple shooting above. It wasn’t fired that day though, far too quiet. They were in full annoyance/nuisance mode that day so they fired the unsuppressed 308 all three times.

A small calibre, possibly a 222, and well suppressed rifle so there was bugger all noise and long may that situation last.

It also proves proves that the last killings, using the large calibre, unsuppressed rifle was unnecessary and a deliberate annoyance/nuisance/provocation.

Whoops spoke too soon, they just fired another shot, (2.30pm) this time without a suppressor. That was probably  Stephen (pisshead) Poynter and his .243, another deliberate tort. How many torts is that now and which one will be representative of them all?

Even though Poynter phoned in a warning to them earlier this morning the cops are sticking to their idiotic POLICY of not passing the warning on to us.

A warning from the cops 5 minutes prior to the gunfire and the continued use of the rifle in the latest photographs is all we ask.

Poynter using his unsuppressed 22 and 243 for pet cat, domestic deer,  wild goat, nuisance, celebration and provocation shooting  is another matter all together and will be, together with a number of other torts, the subject of soon to be filed civil proceedings.

THESE THREE PHOTOGRAPHS PROVE THAT THE FIRING OF THE UNMODERATED 308 WAS/IS DONE TO SHOCK, FRIGHTEN, ANNOY AND PROVOKE MY FAMILY AND THAT STEPHEN POYNTER, ANTHONY HANNA AND THE GREY HAIRED COOT WERE/ARE IN A CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY.

Three calls to Wanganui Noise Control permanently stopped Poynter’s ridiculously loud stereo provocations.

More than three calls to the Police about Poynter’s thunderous high-powered firearms misuse provocations made absolutely no difference. Does that mean that the NZ Police is knowingly and willingly aiding and abetting Poynter’s criminal provocations?

https://bcops.wordpress.com/paper-trail/

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

11/3/15

I noticed some blue smoke in our valley at about 9am this morning, it had made its way along the hill to the left (South) and collected in the dead end valley shown.

And low and behold at about 10am two firemen walked up our drive.

I went out and spoke to them and they told me that Poynter had rung them, reported smoke and was adamant it was coming from 22A Paterson St. But the wind was from the South and the smoke was on his place as well so it must have come from over his way. Fire Comms confirmed it was Poynter that rang 111.

Bone-head  knows that shooing cattle over our way will cost him money

and because of the thriving hedge between us, we can no longer see any of his other demented shenanigans so he thought he’d make another false 111 call to the fire brigade.

112 Misuse of telephone device

• (2)Every person commits an offence who—

  • (b)in using a telecommunications device, knowingly gives any fictitious order, instruction, or message.

  (3)Every person who commits an offence against subsection (1) or subsection (2) is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 months or a fine not exceeding $2,000.

But to cover himself (he thought) in case this latest false allegation scheme was discovered for what it was he first got a fire permit.

Fire at the rear of the Lady Joy Rest Home.

Smoke coming in our direction.

Fresh cut branches on doused ashes.

And the NZ Police have aided and abetted this psychopathic fool since 2006.

___________

THE LAW DOESN’T APPLY TO THE POYNTER FAMILY.

First it was the role model of the family driving while disqualified,

Click to enlarge.

and now it’s the apprentice criminal.

How old is he, 12?

——————————————————————–

6/5/15

“I don’t give a rats arse about your argument with Stephen Poynter.”

So why is the drongo trying a bit more intimidation, ANTHONY HANNA outside his place of work.

What a tough guy, makes me shiver.

Same brainless jerk!

Rest home warned over homekill beef

By Melissa Wishart

Jun 30, 2015

Lady Joy Rest Home in Aramoho has received an official warning for illegally serving homekilled meat to its residents.

Director Stephen Poynter told investigators he did not realise it was illegal, and his family had eaten the same meat.

Ministry of Primary Industries investigators visited the rest home on March 24 and found 78kg of bagged and frozen beef in a freezer, meat from a cattle beast that had been born and raised on the director’s property, then slaughtered and processed by a registered homekill operator.

The visit was sparked after an anonymous member of the public sent out a letter to the Whanganui District Health Board and the Wanganui Chronicle claiming the directors of the rest home were routinely serving homekill beef and pork products to their residents.

The letter writer pointed to parts of the Animal Products Act 1999 saying homekill product could not be provided as food to customers or paying guests.

Mr Poynter said the processing of the animals had now changed.

“The prime Hereford was owned by the residents at birth, born and raised at the rest home’s surrounding 30 acres and formed part of the recreational programme,” Mr Poynter told the Chronicle.

“The residents are able to continue to enjoy their own prime Hereford, processing is simply changed from the professional licensed homekilling company to Affco.”

A statement from the ministry said home-kill meat was not allowed to be served to residents as it was not inspected by a vet for disease, and consumers had no guarantee it had been processed hygienically.

“Although providing homekill meat to the rest home residents was illegal, the meat was processed correctly as homekill and then frozen prior to cooking, which considerably lessened the risk to those eating it,” the statement said.

“MPI issued an official warning to the rest home and the director involved and is undertaking a programme of unannounced food safety inspections …” “

– Wanganui Chronicle

NO WONDER HANNA WAS SO PISSED OFF!

6/5/15

18/02/2015

Stephen and Suzanne Poynter of 26A Paterson Street, Wanganui are routinely serving homekill beef and pork to residents of their jointly owned Lady Joy Rest Home at 64 Patterson Street, Wanganui.

Animal Products Act 1999

2.5 USE AND CONSUMPTION OF HOMEKILL PRODUCT

Homekill product is for the use or consumption of the animal owner including their family or household and must not be traded.

The inclusion of ‘family’ and ‘household’ is to provide for normal family social occasions. The Animal Products Act does not define these.

However, a family is not intended to include extended family living elsewhere, and a household is intended to cover the occupants of a house or similar residential unit, but not include an institution or tourist accommodation.

 2.7 CAN YOU FEED HOMEKILL TO PAYING GUESTS?

Generally, no. Those who supply a meal as part of a tourist package including farm-stays, hunting lodges, or tourist barbecues, cannot use homekill product as part of the food provided to their customers.

 Paying guests also include those who pay board, fees or other forms of payment as part of an accommodation package.

Institutions such as boarding schools, universities, hospitals and prisons cannot serve homekill and must provide inspected meat from a regulated source.

 The records show that,

 17/06/14    Two fully grown cattle beasts owned by the Poynters` were killed and processed by homekill operator Anthony Hanna.

 14/10/14    Two fully grown cattle beasts owned by the Poynters` were killed and processed by homekill operator Anthony Hanna.

 17/02/15    Two fully grown cattle beasts owned by the Poynters` were killed and processed by homekill operator Anthony Hanna.

Mature pigs owned by the Poynters` are killed and processed by homekill operator Anthony Hanna at short period regular intervals.

.

 “Director Stephen Poynter told investigators he did not realise it was illegal,”   Yeah Right!

“The prime Hereford was owned by the residents at birth, born and raised at the rest home’s surrounding 30 acres and formed part of the recreational programme,” Mr Poynter told the Chronicle.”

“Although providing homekill meat to the rest home residents was illegal, the meat was processed correctly as homekill “

17/2/15

“consumers had no guarantee it had been processed hygienically”

“recreational programme” on 20 acres of perpendicular gorse and slips and 5 acres of shady flood plain.

A COMPULSIVE LIAR WHO NEVER KNOWS WHEN TO SHUT THE FUCK UP!

Some of his “prime Herefords” tucking into some lush pasture.

17/2/15

Yeah goodbye, ya banjo pickin inbreed!

.

And who do the cops call when they need to dispose of a body? Their co-conspirator of course.

ANTHONY HANNA, ARAMOHO HOME-KILL OPERATOR, another nutter!

I NOTICE THAT HANNA’S HOME KILL BUSINESS HAS SHUT UP SHOP, HAD TO HAPPEN, TOO MANY DODGY GOINGS ON. ANOTHER ONE OF MY PREDICTIONS PANS OUT.

A BAD DAY ON THE POYNTER SPREAD

First he tips his truck over dumping rubbish and then he forgets the flood sump and down goes the digger. Dumbarse!

——————————————————————————————————————–

AT LAST, SHE’S COME TO HER SENSES AND KICKED HIM TO THE KERB! DUMPED THE PSYCHO BASTARD ONCE AND FOR ALL.

The pet killing phycho is gone, no more quad and dirt bikes ripping up and down, no more pet killings, no more stereos, roosters etc. He’s taken the kids and moved out. She’s still there but there’s not been a squeak out of her since he and the kids left.

HE JUST COULDN’T RESIST THE URGE TO HAVE ANOTHER GO THOUGH!

On 24/10/2020 Poynter roped in Masonic moron  Martin Arrell to fire off his 222 on number 44 Paterson to incite me into breaking the law. First it was Poynter and his unmoderated 243 way back in 06 and many other times since, then it was the home kill guy with his 308. Then it was Matthew Krs with Poynter’s 243 and now it’s this drongo doing Poynter’s dirty work. There were others, I’m not home all of the time.

Worshipful Wanker.

The AR-15 rifle usually comes chambered for either the military cartridge 5.56×45mm or the .223 Remington. Because of the pressures associated with the 5.56x45mm, it is not advisable to fire 5.56x45mm rounds in an AR-15 marked as .223 Rem, since this can result in damage to the rifle or injury to the shooter^{[citation needed]}. The AR-15 can be converted to other calibers; it is then often referred to as an AR-15 style rifle.

FUCK OFF!!!

Oops, spoke too soon. Idiot face was next door again, this time with his daughter Coral, a digger and quad bike. They had come in through the back of number 44 Paterson st.

Making lots of unnecessary noise, so much so that one time wife and co conspirator and offender, Suzie Poynter, loudly demanded to know why he was “back here” and “I told you not to come back here.” and to finish it off she shouted even louder for him to “Fuck off.” She appears to hate him nearly as much as I do. Hearing all that made my day, my week even. Well worth a celebration, aye Martin?

.

Worshipful Wanker Martin Arrell toasting Poynter’s departure from 26a Patterson Street.

.

AND THEN ALONG CAME SENIOR SERGEANT SHAYNE WAINHOUSE

.

During our discussions at my home SS Wainhouse  admitted knowing and working with Colin Irvine in Wanganui but he pretended not to know the balaclava idiot Nevil Haggart even though they had been stationed together in Wanganui. That was the first inkling that I was talking to another cover-up fixer liar.

I made a complaint to Whanganui police boss that Poynter had used some halfwit to attract my attention and provoke me by firing a high powered rifle in my vicinity.

2 11 2020

ATTENTION Inspector Nigel Alan, THIS IS A COMPLAINT.

On Saturday, ‎24 ‎October ‎2020, ‏‎at about 3.45 p.m. I was initially shocked and frightened and then very annoyed by two high-powered rifle shots that were fired near my dwellinghouse from the direction of 26a Paterson Street, Whanganui. I have every reason to believe that the shots were fired by Stephen Charles Poynter and one other in order to annoy, shock, frighten, and provoke me into committing some form of unlawful retaliation.

Arms Legislation Act 2020

75 Section 48 replaced (Discharging firearm, airgun, pistol, or restricted weapon in or near dwellinghouse or public place)

Replace section 48 with:

48 Discharging firearm, airgun, pistol, or restricted weapon in or near dwellinghouse or public place

A person commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months, or to a fine not exceeding $10,000, if the person, without reasonable excuse, discharges a firearm, airgun, pistol, or restricted weapon in or near a dwellinghouse or a public place so as to—

(a)

endanger property; or

(b)

endanger, annoy, or frighten any person.

“one other” Stephen Charles Poynter will know his co-conspirator/offender’s

name, address and occupation.

Jacobus van der Lubbe

22a Paterson Street,

Whanganui.

I got no response to my complaint from Nigel Alan so I complained to the IPCA to see if that would stir matters up and surprisingly it did.

This email got the ball rolling.

Firearms complaint 24/10/2020

SHANE WAINHOUSE

Hello Mr van der Lubbe

I have been assigned to investigate your complaint in respect to the incident that occurred on 24 October 2020.

When is convenient for me to come and speak to you about the matter?

Regards

Shayne Wainhouse

O/C Prevention

Senior Sergeant D481  |  Whanganui Police

New Zealand Police  |  Nga Pirihimana O Aotearoa

10 – 14 Bell Street  |  PO Box 443  |  Whanganui 4500

Bus 06 349 0600  |  DDI 06 349 0663  |  Cell 021 191 5487

.

J vdl <jjnvdl@gmail.com>	Dec 7, 2020, 3:05 PM
to Shayne

.

SS Wainhouse and some minder cop duly arrived at my home and we got down to business. It was obvious  from the start that Wainhouse was only interested in getting Poynter off the hook. He wanted to know how far Poynter was from my house when he fired the shots, where our boundaries were, where It was in relation to my place that the photographs were taken, and where Poynter and his accomplice were when I first spotted them. I pointed out the spot and he asked me if he could take a photo. I said yea, and he whipped out his cell phone and took a pic.

I asked Wainhouse if he knew who Poynter’s “accomplice” was and he said “Yes we do.” I then asked him to tell me who it was and he said he could email me the name. Of course he never did tell me, well not deliberately anyway. lol

He then said that Poynter had rung the police that day to say that he was going to shoot goats on his property. But as usual the cops didn’t warn us. I then gave Wainhouse a “Summary of facts to read to make sure he understood Poynter’s motives for firing off the unsuppressed high-powered firearm. Wainhouse knew then that it wasn’t a simple case of Poynter firing too close to a dwelling house but a way more serious matter of unlawful possession of a firearm with malicious intent.

Sandra then said that the big booms were very disconcerting and Wainhouse chimed in with, “And another thing, the terrain is like an amphitheater and you wouldn’t be quite sure where it was coming from.”

When I showed Wainhouse my book of still photos of Poynter and his “accomplice” sitting on Poynter’s “top flat” I watched his face as he flicked through them. As soon as he saw the closeup photo of  Poynter’s “accomplice” his face turned first to anger and then to despair. It appeared to me that Wainhouse recognized the face (Martin Arrell) and also that his cover-up job had just become a lot harder. Maybe Wainhouse is a Mason too. No wonder he didn’t want to tell me his name.

.

A few days later Wainhouse and his minder came round home again saying that he wanted to run through what he’d done in relation to my complaint and hear what I thought. He started by addressing the “Summary of Facts: that I had given him on his first visit. Below.

1 12 2020

Arms Act 1983

• Warning: Some amendments have not yet been incorporated
•  

45Carrying or possessing firearms, etc, except for lawful, proper, and sufficient purpose

(1)

Every person commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 4 years or to a fine not exceeding $5,000 or to both who, except for some lawful, proper, and sufficient purpose,—

(a)

carries; or

(b)

is in possession of—

any firearm, airgun, pistol, prohibited magazine, restricted weapon, or explosive.

(2)

In any prosecution for an offence against subsection (1) in which it is proved that the defendant was carrying or in possession of any firearm, airgun, pistol, prohibited magazine, restricted weapon, or explosive, as the case may require, the burden of proving the existence of some lawful, proper, and sufficient purpose shall lie on the defendant.

Possession of a firearm is unlawful if it is for the purpose of annoying, frightening or incitement and that is exactly what they did.

Poynter and his accomplice possessed, carried and fired Poynter’s rifles solely to annoy, frighten and/or incite me.

“the burden of proving the existence of some lawful, proper, and sufficient purpose shall lie on the defendant.”

SUMMARY OF FACTS

On Saturday, ‎24 ‎October ‎2020, ‏‎at about 3.45 p.m. I was initially shocked by and then very annoyed by two high-powered rifle shots that were fired near my dwelling house from the direction of 26a Paterson Street, Whanganui so I cranked up my DJI Mavic camera drone to look for whoever fired the shots. It could have been anyone, illegal hunters, shitstirrers, snipers, inciters, unlawful firearms possessors, who knows? It took me about 5 minutes of looking about, from directly above my home at first, (because the shots were so loud) and then further out before I spotted a couple of characters sitting openly on a ridge. With careful looking at the video and photo 1 below the pair can be seen sitting on the ridge at @ 58 seconds after takeoff. Photo 1.

(photo 1)

and also @ 1 minute 20 and photo 2.

(photo 2)

However, I continued searching because I didn’t spot them at first on my little phone monitor until about 6 or 7 minutes after the shots were fired I finally spotted the two figures sitting on Stephen Poynter’s middle ridge.

(photo 3)

I flew a bit closer to try to identify the pair and when one of them invited me in for an even closer look by waving I obliged. 5min 59 on the video.

Photo 4

Stephen Poynter is on the left is using binoculars. Note that they are sitting close to a dead goat. Once I had identified the main culprit, (the drone camera has a very good zoom lens) Stephen Charles Poynter of  64 Paterson St Aramoho Whanganui, pig  farmer and soon to be bachelor boy, and had also established what they were up to (incitement, hence unlawful possession.), I flew the short distance home. Both the firearms depicted in photos 5, 6 and 7 belong to Stephen Poynter. The one on the left is a 22 rimfire and the other is a 243 centerfire. The “mystery man” in photo 7 is pictured holding the 22 rimfire. Aiming the rifle at the drone crossed his mind (that’s why he picked it up) but he thought better of it. He was dumb enough to be sucked in by Poynter’s lies to join in on the fool’s errand, but it appears that he’s not a total plonker.

Photo 5

photo 6

photo 7

Stephen Charles Poynter and his accomplice (Wainhouse insisted that Arrell was an associate rather than an accomplice) were in unlawful possession of firearms at the time they were videoed and for the 5 minutes before because they were not where they were to shoot (or as Poynter puts it “retire”) wild goats, but their sole intention for being in possession and discharging the firearm at that time was to “incite” me into some form of unlawful behaviour. IE: commit the heinous crime of flying my camera drone over a minute portion of Poynter’s “rural” property to video the criminals at work.

Poynter brought his firearms to the scene and fired the large calibre one to attract my attention and incite me, and he then pretended that his behaviour was lawful by using the bogus pretext of shooting wild goats on his own property.

That Poynter videoed the proceedings, smiling and waving as he did so and making sure he included a dead goat in his video, (refer photo 8 below)

Photo 8

 Photo 8 shows that the whole thing was a set up and that Stephen Poynter’s motives were, (as usual) highly suspect, and that his actions were dishonest, unfit, improper, and unlawful and in contravention of the Arms Act 1983

• Warning: Some amendments have not yet been incorporated
•  

45 Carrying or possessing firearms, etc, except for lawful, proper, and sufficient purpose

I was wrong about the high-powered rifle, it was Martin Arrell’s .222 that fired the shots not Poynter’s .243, or was I?

Where was Poynter’s .243 during the fool’s errand you ask?

THE TRUTH IS SOMETIMES STRANGER THAN FICTION  (see above)

During our second meeting I asked Wainhouse for Poynter’s current address but he refused to give it. I already knew what the outcome of Wainhouse’s “investigation” was and I told him that I needed Poynter’s address for a charging document but he refused to give me the address even though Poynter knew mine. Sounds like the usual justice obstruction to me.

I asked Wainhouse why a convicted drug dealer and twice convicted drink driver has got a firearms licence (Poynter)

and he replied, “I can’t answer that but he has got a gun licence.”

Wainhouse then said that Poynter had rung the Police on that day to say that he was going hunting and that the Police had failed to pass the warning on to us. “We made no attempt to phone either landline or cell phone and the Police are at fault in that we haven’t followed up how we said we would follow up.”

I then told Wainhouse about the Police “We never tell infmt” that Poynter is about to shoot document and he replied that he’d be really interested to see that document. I promised to send him a copy.

On his third visit to my home and after seeing the Comms document above that states that “We never tell infmnt, it’s none of his business and we’ll see what happens”, Wainhouse said that he had fixed the notification problem and we would, in future, get a warning call if Poynter rang the Police to say that he was going shooting. In addition to that he said that if Poynter did ring the Police they would send an officer to listen for shots and check to see if Poynter was acting within Police instructions.

So what happens? On ……………………………. Poynter rings the Police to say that he is going shooting and the first we hear of it is, as usual, unsuppressed gunfire coming from behind number 44. Sandra, the wife, rang 111 to report the shots and I put the drone up to try and see who was firing the shots.

I had no luck with the drone (short arse must have been in hiding) so I drove our ute to the Lady Joy and parked outside to see if the cops would turn up. I waited there for ………….but no marked cop cars showed so I drove into number 44 Paterson (also Poynter’s) and bobs your uncle Poynter’s SUV was parked in there out of site from the street and the air. I backed out of the drive and rang 111. After telling Comms what I had discovered I was told, in no uncertain terms, to go home. I said I would and turned on my police scanner and heard a cop say to a colleague, “I told him to mind his own business”. So Wainhouse’s promise to fix things was, as usual, a load of bollocks.

It didn’t end there though. Instead of going home I decided to park behind a cop car that had arrived outside the Lady Joy. The car was empty and after a while I heard on my scanner a male cop say to Police Comms that he had spoken to Poynter and that everything was “kosher” and to k1 the complaint. As the cop returned to his patrol car this happened.

I heard Poynter and the cop chirping and laughing in the distance and as the cop went to get into his car I approached him. I asked him his name and he replied “David Bull”. I then asked him what caliber rifle Poynter was using and he replied, “What businesses it it of yours?” I told him that I was the complainant is this matter and repeated my what caliber question. He said a suppressed 22 but I could sense that he was holding back. He then said that Poynter had rung the police to say that he was going shooting and that he was using a pump action 22 and a suppressed Ruger 22. No mention of a suppressor on the pump action except for “It doesn’t matter if its got a suppressor or not”, so that would account for the shots we heard from inside our house.

I asked Bull why I could hear suppressed shots from inside my house and he replied “Over sensitive hearing perhaps?” And after a bit more bull from Bull about how Poynter was within his legal rights to shoot on his own land I told him he was a fucking idiot and to get out of the way so I could drive away. Just after I got home  I heard Bull ask Comms if there was some sort of arrangement re Poynter and his shooting and another Police voice (Wainhouse?) broke in and told Bull to come back to the Station and he would tell him about it. It now appears that Wainhouse has quit the Police and none other than Sergeant bullshitter Shaun Jones has been passed the poisoned chalice. And Jones’s method of dealing with my OIA requests is to ignore them completely.

Look at the fucking wanker, Bull shouting and waving his finger at me because I dared to question his integrity and IQ level.

A SPECIAL KIND OF MENTAL!

THE PSYCHOPATH IS POISONING HIS KID’S MINDS.

The collusion happens “naturally” within the narcissist’s circle of intimates and closest family members, for whom the narcissist’s character defect is invisible despite its nearly constant evidence. This is why the narcissist’s children, for example, will so often defend their parent from any accusations of wrongdoing even as they face evidence of it. The same goes for spouses. It helps that usually both the spouses and children share the narcissistic pathology.

LIKE FATHER LIKE DAUGHTER, BOTH INSANE.

It’s been three months to the day since idiot face and his kids have come onto number 44 with the sole intent of annoying me and my family by discharging firearms, gut shooting animals, leaving dead animals to rot where I can see them. Clearly the actions of a psychopath.

 “If you come round here with your guns to stir up the Lubbys ever again I’ll call the insurance company and tell them how you made a fraudulent insurance claim on the old Bennett house behind the Lady Joy after you and Robertson deliberately burnt it down.   Arson and insurance fraud, plus the drug dealing and drink driving convictions,” that will look good on your CV. I just might add the fact that you conned me and Robertson into make false statements to the police about seeing old Lubby with a rifle, how pissed off  you were that you only wounded Lubbys cat and how pleased you were at having slit Lubby’s pet goat’s throat.

” If you so much as think about coming round here with your guns again I’ll see to it that you go down for all the other shit that you and your gullible co-conspirators have done.”

And to think that I wasted 14 plus years of my life on a “slimy blowhard” wanker like you. Fuck! It creeps me out to think that I was that dumb to go along with your fucked up plans to destroy the Lubbys. What did they do to you anyway? Old Lubby caught you out on tape being a threatening liar and made you sweat it out until that dumb judge Davidson let you off with a warning that you ignored from day one. I’m surprised old Lubby hasn’t carried out his promise to “retire” you yet. Maybe he’s enjoying watching you suffer the ongoing pain of being kicked to the kerb.”

AND IF IT WASN’T FOR DETECTIVE COLIN IRVINE AND HIS INITIAL LIES ABOUT ME IDIOT FACE POYNTER AND ALL THE OTHER LOSERS THAT PRECEDED HIM WOULD HAVE BEEN STOPPED AT DAY ONE AND THIS EPIC EXPOSE` WOULD NOT HAVE MADE IT TO THE WWW.

WHAT’S  THE MATTER BACHELOR BOY, HAVE YOU RUN OUT OF BULLETS?  

Idiot face, wearing a blue t shirt and looking over fence, is busy boasting about how great a neighbour he used to be to the bloke at number 30 Paterson st while his car (top right) is at number 44 Paterson. The dead deer can be seen by the of the pile of posts and timber. 

What a fucking wanker, the cops have revoked his firearms licence, so when he found a dead deer hung up in a fence near the Lady Joy he dragged it over to where I was certain to see it to make me think that he’s still “retiring” harmless pets. 

I wonder how long it will take for the penny to drop?

MORE GOOD NEWS!

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/resthome-with-18-residents-could-be-sold-after-shareholders-fight-liquidators/HN6FFQAYABHHZF47WPVUFCOOAA/

Appointment/Release of Liquidators
LADY JOY HOME LIMITED and LIVING WELL NOMINEES LIMITED (both in liquidation)
Notice of Appointment of Liquidators and
Notice to Creditors to Claim

Pursuant to Section 255(2)(a) and Liquidation Regulation 12 of the Companies Act 1993

Iain Bruce Shephard and Jessica Jane Kellow, Licensed Insolvency Practitioners of BDO Wellington (Registration Numbers: IP71 and IP75), were appointed liquidators of the companies by special resolution of the shareholders on 20 December 2022 at 10.30am.

Notice is hereby given that as liquidators of the companies, we fix 26 January 2023 as the day on or before which the creditors of the companies are to make their claims, and to establish any priority their claims may have under section 312 of the Companies Act 1993 (as amended), or to be excluded from the benefit of any distribution made before the debts are claimed or, as the case may be, from objecting to the distribution.

Creditors and Shareholders May Direct Enquiries During Normal Business Hours to: Matthew Pearn, BDO Wellington, Business Restructuring, Level 1, 50 Customhouse Quay, Wellington 6011. Postal Address: PO Box 10340, Wellington 6143. Telephone: (04) 498 3871. Email: matthew.pearn@bdo.co.nz.

Dated this 21st day of December 2022.

IAIN SHEPHARD, Liquidator.