40 CATHERINE J KENNEDY, a shocking story of elder abuse by a Grey Power employee.
6/2/2022
KEEPING WELL LEFT TODAY DUGGIE AND NO THREATS OF VIOLENCE BUT STILL HURLING ABUSE.
But 7 years after being exposed as an elder abuser the ugly old bag is still yelling out obscenities. Once a bitch, always a mole.
3/09/2015
Manipulate, obfuscate, smear, lie, and stigmatize.
Immediately Catherine Kennedy, (that’s her with the fat face above) the former Grey Power Wanganui Newsletter Editor, learned (to her horror) that her recently deceased elder brother Bert van der Lubbe had made a new Will that superseded the one that gave her a one 8th share and full control of his Estate she wrote to a number of her siblings urging them to write abusive and insulting letters to me, Jacobus van der Lubbe, the new Executor and Trustee (controller) of Bert’s Estate. Kennedy wrote the letters to her siblings urging them to try to bully me into abandoning the appointments my brother had bestowed upon me or get me “tipped out” of being the executor.
She also requested that her siblings photocopy their supposedly private letters to me and send the copies to her. Gullible and thoroughly manipulated, they all did as she asked.
Sibling Margret Vlaar said at Bert’s funeral; “Thanks to Jack for taking Bert grocery shopping after he lost his driver’s license and thanks to Cathy for letting Bert live in her house rent-free for all those years.”
“her house” my arse, If it wasn’t for Bert and the sale of his treasured freehold house in Sydney Place, Mum’s then immaculate house would have been sold soon after she entered the old folks’ home and Bert would have been spared the indignity of being lorded over by control freak Kennedy with her much-touted “majority share” for 17 years. Didn’t expect Bert to live quite that long did you bitch? Kennedy engineered the deal so that she would own 51% to Bert’s 49%. It could have just as easily been the other way round but the avaricious mole just had to be the boss. Poor Bert went from being the master of his debt-free home to a prisoner in “Cathy’s house“. I say “prisoner” because of the way the management agreement was worded. “We know that Catherine and Doug had a legal agreement with Bert that, if he left the house, then the management of the house would revert to them.” Poor deluded Bert thought that that meant that if he left the house, even for one night, he would be “tipped out” onto the street by the dastardly duo. Kennedy engineered Bert’s first Will at around the same time as the house sales and that is evidenced by the fact that it bequeathed to her, just her, all his valuable vinyl LPs, and the even more valuable vintage Meccano sets. Right-wing nut jobs are so money hungry. She was left out of the second Will entirely, (man that must have pissed her off), but that didn’t stop her from keeping (stealing) all of the vintage Meccano and most of the LPs after she discovered she was not entitled to them. The PS of MEV005 below shows that she kept the Meccano from me, called me a potential thief, and lied about it not being able to be quantified. I suspect that by that time she had already sold the valuable vintage stuff and this “go into hiding” bull was just arse covering.
Anyway, the moment she got all of the sibling letter copies together she took them to the Wanganui Police (porky bastards) and submitted them as “evidence” that I was, or might be, planning to physically attack her or her property. They weren’t the only outrageous lies she told the cops but I’ll put them aside for now. She made sure I knew what she had done by instructing her lawyer David Robertson of Armstrong Barton to inform me that she had denounced me to the Police. What an evil and very dumb bitch! Just as dumb as her lying predecessors about whom she had previously read in these pages. She, like Cullum, Britton, and Poynter, was emboldened to offend against me by the obvious bias the cops had shown against me and mine since Cornelius told his first lies about me all those years ago. She was even dumber than the aforementioned dumbarses for not noticing that even with thoroughly bent cops lending a duplicitous hand, evil does not often get its way.
Just as in the first attempt to use my siblings to try to coerce me into submission, Kennedy continued her pattern of elder abuse with the intent that I would be intimidated from carrying out my duties as Executor and Trustee of my late brother’s Estate by a police investigation of her malicious and unwarranted allegations. She tried to use the NZ Police to prevent me from going about my lawful business. Attempting to pervert the course of justice is one offense that springs readily to mind. Knowingly making a false complaint is another. But the cops aren’t that dumb and told her there was no evidence of any malicious intent on my part. It seems as though right-wing nut jobs resort to that type of criminal behavior to try and get their wicked way on a regular basis. http://www.radionz.co.nz/audio/player?audio_id=201851765
Kennedy’s evil scheme to use her trusting and mentally ill elder brother Bert to secure her late mother’s house for her own enrichment backfired (she expected that all of Bert’s Estate would go towards the now much-needed renovations, see 1. of dopey Eric’s (Lisa Marie) April 2, 2015, letter) and she would get all of the capital gains. Kennedy’s illegal actions against me prove once again what a sinister article she actually is.
“Look beneath what is happening here. I ask the question who has the most to win here. Follow the money.” Catherine Kennedy, Whaleoil blog, September 18, 2014.
I’m not at all surprised at Catherine Kennedy’s disgusting behaviour as she is clearly besotted with the one time feral master manipulator Cameron Slater. Judging by her attempt to use the cops against me she has taken his “When attacked give back double.” strategy to “seriously weird” dimensions.
Breaking News: This is still a multi award-winning blog
Catherine Kennedy 9 months ago on Whaleoil.
Warm congrats Cam and team. Richly deserved. Suck that up all the haters.
Catherine Kennedy 9 months ago on Whaleoil.
I was with a group of about 8 yesterday. I asked them if anyone had accessed Whaleoil. One had. When I said I did regularly, I was told I was not the person this particular person thought I was. I defended my position. On the way out one said to me “what was that website again. I hope it is not too long before you can “Cam out” the left Cam because the MSM is working its dirty tricks on at least the older generation.
Well, Kennedy certainly knows all about working dirty tricks on the older generation.
_____________________________________________________________________
Catherine Kennedy a year ago on Whaleoil.
Thank goodness. I have worked hard in Whanganui to get our hard-working Chester Burrows (sic) back in, which we achieved. I predicted National to be able to rule alone so am absolutely over the moon over the result. Go team Key
And what does the Grey Power charter say?
- To be non-aligned with any political party, and to present a strong united lobby to all Parliament and statutory Bodies on matters affecting New Zealanders.
Kennedy no longer posts her right-wing nut job opinions on Whaleoil or anywhere else.
Here are some very enlightening emails and Court documents ……… if this is how she uses and abuses her siblings imagine how she would treat elderly strangers if given the opportunity.
What a fucking wanker.
Is it a coincidence that the word “hovel” is now being used to describe Bert’s former home at 12 Sydney Place, Wanganui by several of his siblings? Bert was proud of his little place and to describe it as a “hovel” is an insult to his memory. If it really was a “hovel” it wouldn’t be happily owned and occupied with its original roof and exterior 20 years later.
THE MANSELL MEMO IN ACTION ONCE AGAIN.
Frcm:
Sent;
To:
Subfrt:
Catherine Kennedy
Wednesday, 5 May 2015 10:21 AM
‘Margaret Vlaad;’Elisa Hillman’; Hans Stephens; louisamarievdl@gmail.com
re: Jack’s letter to Marg
Hieveryone
I have Just spoken to Michael van Delden.
He did write to Bert in 2013 as a routine catch up, for the first time since he made his will in 2002, to ask if it was all still okay. He pointed out that although the will was correct it did not state specifically anything about his ownership share in the property.
I imagine Bert talked to Jack at that point because Bert went and picked up a copy of his will and the other documents regarding the agreement between me and him and probably the sale and purchase agreement. (They
are in Bert’s file)
Bert then went to CLAW, the local free legal service to change his will and made no contact with van Delden at all.
And we know the changes he made.
Jack’s’ “raised a concern … which caused him to make a new will…” was simply about clarifying the property ownership, which was in fact covered in the first will anyway.
Jack is simply trying to raise an element of doubt to divide and conquer.
.. .
Marg, I suggest you call him out on this, Say van Delden has been spoken to and his attempt to fudge why Bert changed his will is just a ruse and the rest of his letter is full of insane rubbish as well.
Van Delden again confirmed that anything Jack says has to be seen as what he is – mad.
By the way I have sold the chest of drawers and the low boy and the table and chairs and the china cabinet of Mum’s. I am waiting to see if the radiogram sells and when it is all finished I wlll report to you all. There is no great fortune involved but they will be gone.
It goes on.
Love
Cathy
A clear attempt to pervert the course of justice.
October 11 2016
A family got screwy over their late brother’s Meccano sets.A family spat over a man’s estate ended up in the High Court after siblings couldn’t agree on how to handle their brother’s Meccano sets and shares in a rundown property. Whanganui man Bert van der Lubbe died in February last year, aged 66. The main asset he left behind was a part-share in a Whanganui property.His sister Catherine Kennedy and her partner Douglas Simpson owned the remaining shares. “Bert was a diagnosed schizophrenic. His living conditions were thought to be poor,” Justice Karen Clark of the High Court wrote in a newly released judgement.Despite his opposition, Bert’s siblings helped him live in a “sanitary” state and Catherine Kennedy conducted repairs on the property. Instead of building bridges, the coveted Meccano sets sparked an irreconcilable family fight.Instead of building bridges, the coveted Meccano sets sparked an irreconcilable family fight. Mary Hooker, another sister but not a beneficiary, also helped with upkeep.The court heard Bert resented these actions, regarding them as intrusive.Last year, Mary arranged the funeral, which all siblings except Louisa van der Lubbe and Jacobus van der Lubbe attended. Later, disputes over the will arose, with one will signed in 2002 but Jacobus presenting another one signed in 2013.Jacobus became the defendant when the dispute went to court. “Predictably, the defendant’s non-attendance at the funeral and the production of a will some weeks after steps had been taken in accordance with the 2002 will gave rise to further deep-seated grievance on both sides,” Justice Clark wrote. Family conflict continued, and little was achieved. Apart from the property, Bert’s Meccano sets formed the nuts and bolts of another dispute. His 2013 will said the sets should be sold, with proceeds split equally among the six beneficiaries. But Catherine and Mary, beneficiaries in the 2002 will, were left out of the later will.Catherine had the Meccano sets, and refused to deliver them to Jacobus. “Catherine is suspicious and mistrustful of the defendant and how he will deal with the Meccano sets,” the judge wrote. She said family hostility was intense, and detrimental to the management of Bert’s estate.
Margaret Vlaar, another beneficiary, said Jacobus had to be removed as executor. She pledged to work constructively with Catherine Kennedy to wind up the estate.
Vlaar also said the Whanganui property was run down, and all beneficiaries except for Jacobus agreed repairs were needed before it was sold. Jacobus said the other family faction acted like a “lynch mob”. He admitted refurbishments were needed, but said he and Kennedy previously stated it could be sold in an “as is where is” condition. Jacobus said he was constantly being thwarted and had behaved honourably but was “unjustifiably denounced” (To the cops) and the target of “non-stop attack”.
Vlaar also sought orders vesting the estate’s interests in her as owner.
Other estate beneficiaries were Louisa van der Lubbe, (Dopey Eric of page 02 fame) another sister named Elizabeth Hillman, and Hans van der Lubbe. Those three consented to the court action but Jacobus did not. Catherine was not a beneficiary but another judge said she should be regarded as a defendant, like Jacobus. Justice Clark said there was “no transparency” in how Jacobus handled funds from Bert’s estate. She said Jacobus could no longer be trustee and executor and there were some “irreconcilable differences” within the family.
Justice Clark said it wasn’t so clear who should replace Jacobus. But she refused to let Vlaar take over. (And there you have it, the judge didn’t trust Vlaar or Kennedy)
She appointed the Public Trust as executor and trustee. (At my written request.)
COSTS
Kennedy’s lawyer demanded that I personally pay all the costs but no, the judge, who had finally seen the light, made Bert’s estate pay the costs. Should have been Kennedy and Vlaar but you can’t win em all.
And another thing, Kennedy failed to produce PROOF that she actually paid for her “majority share” of Mum’s house, you know, receipts, bank statements. The Contract for Sale and Purchase that Bert reluctantly signed stated only that she would pay for her share “if asked”. Asked by whom, our dearly departed mother? And, nor did I get my vinyl LPs back or the estate its valuable Meccano. Thief and liar can be safely added to the other labels she so richly deserves.
BUT WAIT, THERE’S MORE !
11/11/2019
Area Commander
Central Police Station
Bell Street,
Whanganui.
Dear Sir,
On 3/11/2019 at about 11.30am I was riding my ebike along the Somme Parade bike/foot path just past the Sydney place intersection when two cyclists approached me from the opposite direction. The leading male rode at me in an aggressive manner, passed by me on the wrong side of the path and waved his left fist in my face as he passed close by me. The male cyclist who I believe was Douglas Simpson of 264 Victoria Avenue, Whanganui was followed by a female cyclist, who goes by the name of Catherine Kennedy, and she rode directly at me and I had to take evasive action by riding off the path and onto the road to avoid a collision. She called out an insult as she went by. I believe that Kennedy lives with Simpson at 264 Victoria Avenue.
Then on 09/11/2019 at about 10.15am the same pair of cyclists again approached me from the opposite direction as I rode my ebike along the Anzac Parade cycle/foot path near the Young Street intersection and Douglas Simpson once again approached me in an aggressive manner on my side of the path and swerved away at the last moment passing me very closely and causing me to again take evasive action. Kennedy followed but this time she did nothing but laugh at me being forced off the path.
I believe that Simpson and Kennedy are “behaving in a disorderly manner likely to lead to violence” in an attempt to intimidate me from going about my lawful business or provoke me into responding in an unlawful manner.
Yours faithfully,
J van der Lubbe
22a Paterson Street,
Whanganui.
PS: If Simpson and or Kennedy show any physical aggression against me again I’ll know the Police have ignored this complaint and have thereby become complicit in any future attacks on me by the above named violence inciters.
SNAP, YOU STOOPID FAT HYPOCRITE.
That settles that then, not only are they violence inciters, but they are proven liars as well. See where it says, “Denied cycling agro”?
—————————————————————————————————————————————-
“PS: If Simpson and or Kennedy show any physical aggression against me again I’ll know the Police have ignored this complaint and have thereby become complicit in any future attacks on me by the above named violence inciters.”
That seems to have done the trick, the violence inciters have stopped stalking me as I ride around the bridges.
The cops, as usual, have binned my complaint. Looks like I’ll have to make a private prosecution again. Let me think, “Disorderly behavior likely to lead to violence”. (Inciting violence.) That will look good on their criminal records.
25th March2020
Jack Van Der Lubbe
22a Paterson Street
Aramoho
Whanganui.
Dear Mr Van Der Lubbe
Thank you for your letter dated 12th February 2020. My apologies for the delayed
response. I have read the Ietter and perused the photographs you enclosed.
I don’t believe the photographs prove any offences have been committed. They
Show that the photographer was on the cycleway at the same time as Douglas
Simpson and, your sister, Catherine Kennedy.
One of the photographs shows a male with his face in shadow and an arm
Raised. There is no evidence that this is threatening gesture.
The other photographs show cyclists in different Iocations cycling.
I have scanned copies of the letter and photographs into the investigation file number
191112t6003.
As a result of reviewing these photographs and my investigation of your complaint I
am satisfied there is no evidence of any offenees.
If you have questions in relation to this please email me at colin.wright@police.govt.nz
or call on 021 191 5436.
W+ C. WRIGHT
Sergeant W457
Whanganui.
Colin Wright waits for the six months statues of limitations to kick in then he replies with that obvious bullshit.
ANOTHER CLEAR EXAMPLE OF PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE BY THE POLICE.
THIS IS THE SAME BENT COP THAT COVERED UP POYNTER’S MANY CRIMES.
_________________________________________________________________________________
5 May 2020
Area Commander
Whanganui Police,
Bell Street,
Whanganui.
Dear Sir,
This is a complaint against Sergeant Colin Wright W457 of the Whanganui Police.
Crimes Act 1961
116 Conspiring to defeat justice
Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who conspires to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice in New Zealand or the course of justice in an overseas jurisdiction.
The first time I spoke to Sergeant Colin Wright was as a result of my (10/10/08) 111 call to Police that someone was firing High Power rifle shots near my home.
A fully armed Sergeant Wright attended and after a time spoke with the shooter, a Matthew Krs. After sighting the offender’s firearms licence Sergeant Wright decided then and there that it was reasonable for Krs (that’s his actual surname) to have fired several High Powered rifle shots close to residential housing. I asked Wright what he would do if I found a freshly shot goat on my nearby property and he replied, “You might have carried it over from Poynter’s”.
So here you have a senior police officer who I had never met before suggesting that I am a probable justice perverter. And why did he do that? He did it because of the decades-old, unlawful and unwarranted, and still in force Mansell Memo of course. https://bentcops.org/the-mansell-memo/
The second occasion I had contact with Sergeant Wright was when I again complained to police that I had heard a high powered rifle shot close to my home. By that time, (10/12/08) the police were no longer responding to my complaints of outrageously loud gunfire near my home but they did respond in this instance because they received a second call about the shot by an “anonymous” caller. No gunman was found even though a police tracker dog and several armed police were employed in the search. Stephen Poynter and his wife turned up at the scene of the crime as the “search” was underway and were quickly ushered to safety by concerned police. I, on the other hand, was not warned to take cover even though I was fully exposed at all times. Sergeant Wright soon abandoned the “search” for the gunman and closed the resulting (meager) police file even though, had he bothered to make inquiries, he would have quickly discovered that it was the property owner himself, Stephen Poynter, that had made the “anonymous” 111 call, although, knowing Wright’s history, he probably did discover the truth of the matter and buried it as it was damaging to the success of the long term Police plan. First Poynter fired the shit-stirring shot, then, knowing that a second call to police from someone other than me or a family member, was the only way the police would respond, he called 111 from another house he owns nearby, and also from near where he fired the shot. He had good reason to be confident about not being exposed as the shooter as he had already been told by police that it was me the police were after, no one else. Why do psychopaths do weird things you may ask. He did it to try and further damage my credibility.
The third occasion I made contact with Sergeant Wright was after my cat was shot and wounded. (27 09 2010) Even though it was obvious my cat had been shot (metal fragments in the shoulder wound and an obvious graze from an ear wound to the shoulder wound) Sergeant Wright categorically stated “there was no evidence that the injury had been caused by a firearm.” “there were traces of metal in it [the shoulder wound] but this was not from a firearm.” He also ignored the fact that Stephen Poynter, the obvious offender, gave a false alibi for where he was at the time the cat was shot.
The fourth occasion I made contact with Sergeant Wright was on or about 23/4/2010 when Stephen Poynter decided he’d use where I was sitting as a backdrop for some target practice.
Poynter, when spoken to about the matter, admitted to Sergeant Wright that it wasn’t a normal or prudent action when he used the bush that he did not own (and right where I happened to be sitting at the time) as the backdrop to a bit of target practice. The circumstances were that Poynter admitted to Wright that he knowingly and willingly used the bush at the back of my wife’s property as the backdrop to his target shooting without permission of the legal landowner and without establishing that the firing zone was clear of people or stock.
But once again Sergeant Wright proved his criminal bias and decided that in his opinion Poynter carried out the sighting in of his firearm in a safe manner given all the circumstances. (Poynter still holds a firearms license.)
The fifth occasion I made contact with Sergeant Wright was when he phoned me at home and asked if he could drop by to talk to me about my cat. (10/4/11) I said ok and Sergeant Wright soon arrived at my upper drive gate. Instead of starting to talk about my cat he immediately launched into a completely unrelated matter. I pulled him up and reminded him that he was here to talk about the cat shooting matter. He said, “its all the same” and attempted to continue with his unrelated subject. I stopped him again and told him that he had gained entry to my property under false pretenses and that he had lied to me. He denied that he had lied. I told him again that he had gained entry under false pretenses and that he was now trespassing. He then claimed several times that he was “entitled to be here”. So I told him, citing the Trespass Act, to vacate the property immediately. He refused to obey my lawful order so I turned and walked back to my house. He remained at the gate shouting at my receding back about his unrelated subject.
And finally, for the sixth time I made contact with Sergeant Wright he again ignored his Police oath and the law and perverted the course of or obstructed justice by disregarding the compelling evidence contained in my complaint to the Police (11/11/19) by shamelessly declaring that “no offences have been committed.” Another police officer (MCC702) that looked at my complaint prior to Sergeant Wright getting his corrupt hands on it, suggested that a warning would likely be sufficient, i.e. a minor offence had been disclosed, but again Sergeant Wright went into cover-up mode (full Mansell) and declared that “there is no evidence of any offences,” (see Wright’s letter dated 25 3 2020 and Police document MS1777) but not posted until late April, (After the statutes of limitations had run out.) The decades-old, unlawful and supposedly rescinded Mansell Memo to all officers that any and all complaints by myself or my family were to be ignored, or if ignoring them was impossible, were to be resulted in favour of the offender/s is still slavishly adhered to by the ignorant nasties in the NZ Police.
The last one may seem trivial but it is convincing, compelling evidence that Sergeant Colin Wright’s pattern of corruption, that he started all the way back in 10/10/08, continues to this day.
Yours faithfully
Jacobus van der Lubbe
22a Paterson Street,
Whanganui.
===========================================================================
Attention Mr Jacobus Van Der Lubbe – Your Complaint To IPCA – Ref: 20-3257
| WRIGHT COMPLAINT | x |
|
Thu, May 7, 11:11 AM (0 minutes ago) | |||
|
||||
Dear Mr Van Der Lubbe,
As required by law, your complaint to Police of 4 May 2020, was notified by Police to the Authority.
Your complaint will be assigned to a member of staff within the Authority’s Case Resolution Team who will assess your complaint and contact you in due course. This process may take between two to four months.
If you have any other information relevant to your complaint that you would like the Authority to consider, please forward this to the Authority at case.resolution@ipca.govt.nz or to P O Box 25221, Wellington 6140.
Please refer to the Authority’s website www.ipca.govt.nz for further information about the Authority or the complaints process.
Yours sincerely,
Case Resolution Team
|
6:27 AM (0 minutes ago) | |||
|
||||
Dear Case Resolution Team,
This matter is between me and the cops and if they don’t charge Sergeant Colin Wright with perverting/defeating the course of justice I’ll do it myself.
Yours truly
Jacobus van der Lubbe.
Bent Cops 