Bent Cops

It’s hard to believe but the cops hate me so much they (Police Communications) couldn’t resist telling everyone on duty on the afternoon of 25 July 2023 that a “willful trespasser” had dropped some litter on our driveway. You’d think that the cops would have better things to do than conspire with lawbreakers to break the law.

Area Commander: Inspector Neil Forlong (relieving)
Headquarters: Whanganui Central Police Station

After being with Vodafone for a number of years without a single hitch I unknowingly got a tiny bit behind with one payment so Vodafone immediately imposed a penalty which I paid on or about 22 June 2019

Later, and for no explicable reason Vodafone decided that they’d try to scam me for some more money. This time it was $202.78.

So I went down to the Vodafone Avenue office to sort things out. No matter what I said the people on duty there didn’t want to know and told me to ring their 0800 number which I did later that day. Well my call was answered by some Asian-sounding chap with kids and chooks making a background din, and all I got from him was you owe money, you pay money. I tried to explain but got nowhere so I hung up and decided then and there that me and Vodafone were history.

Then the harassment started, it was threats to do a mischief to my credit rating and to my bank balance, and even though I made it plain to them that we were square money-wise and I was no longer their loyal customer they barged on with their harassment.

Then it got to the point of trespassers baring paperwork demanding that I identify myself but at the same time refusing to supply their details to me and refusing to leave private property when I, a legal occupier of the property, ordered them to do so.

 And when I reported the matter of the repeat trespasser to the police (Sergeant Kevin Smith) he/they got in on the unlawful acts by shielding the culprit from prosecution. Even though he/they had identified and spoken to the culprit and knew the circumstances of the unlawful behaviour he said that he had no intention of charging the culprit as he was entitled carry out what he was attempting to do. (Not 137 meters inside private property he isn’t.) Refusing to give details when lawfully required to by the lawful occupier and refusing to leave after having been warned to leave the property under the trespass act trumps Kevin Smith’s obstructive excuses for unlawful behaviour every time.

Please see to it that this matter is sorted out promptly.

---

A phone conversation between me and Sergeant Kevin Smith on 26/7/23, the same Sergeant Kevin Smith that said he can’t remember if he told Stephen Poynter that I don’t have a firearms licence that directly led to the Poynters’ making their false claims that they had seen me carrying a firearm.

Me         Hello.

SKS       Hello, Jack van der Lubbe?

Me         Yeah speaking.

SKS       Yeah, Wanganui Police here, Hey umm

Me          Who’s speaking please?

SKS        Kevin.

Me           Kevin who?

SKS         Kevin Smith.

Me           Kevin Smith…Ah yes..Sergeant Kevin Smith is it?

SKS         Yeah, you got it right. (The “slimy blowhard” wanted to remain anonymous.)

Me           Ok carry on. 

SKS         Did you talk to the gentleman that was on your place earlier? (The trespasser had obviously

briefed him)

Me           I ordered a trespasser off and gave the Police the phone..ah.. number plate.

SKS         Oh, did he serve some documents you? 1                                                                                                                               

Me            I told a person who had no permission to come onto my place ….(He interjected)

SKS          Did he serve documents on you?    2

Me             No no, you’re asking the wrong questions, this is about trespass right?

SKS           OK, we haven’t served one.

Me             What? What haven’t you served?

SKS           A trespass order. (He is attempting to obstruct justice here.)

Me             He got one from me, he got a verbal trespass order from me, and he also

                   refused to give me his name and address.

SKS           Did he give you some other documents, did he?    3

Me             Again you are straying from the subject of trespass. I want to know who the

                  chap was cause you’ve got the number, you know who it was. I want to

                   know who it is, his full details, and I want him

                  charged with trespass and failing to give his details, that’s what I want.

SKS          Yeah well, I won’t be doing that, he was trying to serve you papers wasn’t

                  he?      4

Me             Who will be doing that?

SKS           Look, I won’t be doing it Jack.

ME             Who will be then?

SKS            Hey! Listen to me!

Me              No, you listen to me, who will be charging him?

SKS            He was there on a legal and legitimate business…………(Are document servers immune to the

trespass laws?)

Me              No, no, no, no, you’re skirting the law there, he was told to get off and he

                   was told first to give his details and he refused to do both.

SKS            Did he give a file of papers to you?    5

Me              So he was trespassing and that’s the point, the trespass.

SKS            Did he give you other papers?       6

Me              You just won’t give up will ya Kevin Smith? Kevin Smith, you’ll be

                    getting a summons as well, and I’ll be getting a lawyer this time.

SKS             OK good on ya, ok Jack no problems, but he was there for legitimate

                     business.

Mr                 He’s a trespasser.

SKS              Yep ok.

Me               And failing to give details, so that’s two charges, and you’re gonna get

                    one for obstruction. (Obstructing justice)

SKS              Ok

Me               Ok.

SKS              Ok, you know where to get me.

Me               Ok bye.

A clear case of a cop aiding and abetting an offender to escape justice. And 6 times he attempted to aid an offender in a minor (minuscule) civil matter. They’re so screwed up bitter and twisted about me revealing the true nature of the NZ Police on here that they’ll team up with any scumbag that wants to do me harm. Scum like Jerry Cornelius, The Cullums’ Donald Britton, Stephen and Suzanne Poynter, some as yet unidentified carpet baggers and the entire NZ Police or so it appears.

---

So the carpet baggers fell at the first judicial hurdle which proves that they were attempting to extort money from me, had no legal reason to trespass, and also that the NZ Police (Sergeant Kevin J Smith) was/were donkey deep in the conspiracy.

And once again they think they can just walk away.

FROM PAGE 37

Evil bastard. Sergeant Kevin J Smith.

My closest brother died about a week ago and the same day I learned of his passing Sergeant Kevin Smith rang me and asked me when I had seen him last. I told him ‘Tuesday at about 4 pm.” (I had bought him some groceries and smokes.)

Smith then said, “So you are the last person to see him alive.” (A moot point.)

He then told me that my brother’s doctor had refused to sign a death certificate and that a PM would have to be done. He then told me the lie that one of my brothers-in-law had objected to a PM so I should do likewise.

What my brother-in-law had actually said to Smith was, ‘A PM wouldn’t be necessary as the deceased was obviously on his last legs.’

I then asked Smith if he had contacted any of the other family members about getting their opinions on a PM and he replied “No”, I won’t be doing that”. He then practically begged me to object to a PM. I told him I would go along with what the rest of the family decided, “The majority would decide”. He hung up.

The dirty cunt was preparing (manipulating) the groundwork against me in case something untoward was found at the PM. “I was the last person to see the deceased alive and only I objected to a PM.”

And with our shit “legal system” and halfwit juries I’d be well up Paremoremo creek.

FROM PAGE 31

A Sergeant Kevin Smith contacted Poynter and asked him to come into the local nick for a chat. Poynter did so and was again told of his responsibilities in relation to the Arms Act. “In one ear and out the other” is how Smith described it to me on the phone. Smith should have revoked Poynter’s firearms licence there and then, but no the Police had other plans.

.

At that time or shortly thereafter Poynter was told, by the Police, that I do not have a firearms licence and that little “gem” of information set Poynter’s criminal mastermind intellect into hatching a cunning plan to “f****n get” me into deep trouble with the law. Sergeant Kevin J Smith later refused to confirm or deny to me that it was him that had told Poynter that I don’t have a firearms licence. (And we all know what a refusal to confirm or deny means don’t we?)  The latest (4 November 2009) is that Smith “cannot remember” if he told Poynter that or not, a statement that reveals that he has no scruples about revealing such “private” information to the criminal element.

.

Poynter then went home and cooked up a letter/statement calculated to shift Police focus off himself and onto me. The letter, dated 28/2/07 and addressed to Sergeant Kevin Smith, was so full of provable lies, one of them being that he did not threaten me in any way on the morning of 2/2/07, that only a “slimy blowhard” (Smith’s description of Poynter) compulsive liar, who is accustomed to getting his own way, would expect anyone to believe it. Of course the cops, still hurting from their other failures to prove that I’m was the cause of all the dramas set out in previous chapters of this saga, lapped it up.

The second to last paragraph of Poynter’s letter to Sergeant Smith went like this, “I have observed Mr Van Der Lubbe walking his property with a rifle over his shoulder and so has Tristan Robertson, of 41 Paterson Street Wanganui on separate occasions. If Mr Van Der Lubbe does not have a Firearms Licence this gives my family and I great concern.” (8) (Carefully note that Mrs Poynter hadn’t been drawn into the conspiracy yet and that Poynter addressed his false accusation to the same policeman who told him that I don’t have a firearms licence.

10

I DIDN’T FOR A MINUTE THINK THEY WOULD BE THAT DUMB!

Form Of Attestation As A Member Of The Police Of New Zealand (Section 37 of the Police Act 1958) Oath,

I Sergeant Andrew James Bruce McDonald do swear that I will well and truly serve our Sovereign Lady the Queen in the Police, without favour or affection, malice or ill-will (my emphasis) until I am legally discharged: that I will see and cause, Her Majesty’s peace to be kept and preserved: that I will prevent to the best of my power all offences against the peace; and that while I will continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law. So help me God……….Yeah right!

ENTER SERGEANT ANDREW McDONALD whose brief,  from day one, was to protect Stephen Poynter from prosecution and more importantly to try and nail me for something. 

Sergeant McDonald grasped Poynter’s litany of lies letter to Sergeant Smith with both hands and without checking out its bona fides acted on it as though it was the gospel truth. Shortly after this time I phoned McDonald to see how his investigation into my complaint was progressing and he told me “triumphantly” that he had found an independent witness and was about to speak to him. I said, “That sounds interesting.” McDonald’s “independent” witness turned out to be none other than Poynter’s casual labourer Tristan Robertson. I said “That sounds interesting” because, as you have seen above, I had absolute proof that any denials that Poynter had threatened me would be lies.

You know, if Poynter had any brains at all he would have planted a rifle somewhere round my home and then made his false accusation that he had seen me taking a rifle for a walk, that way McDonald would have had something to find when he carried out his search.

12

I later asked Sergeant McDonald (that’s him on the far right) for all the documents that he had generated thus far relating to my complaint of 5/2/07 and he sent me copies of Poynter’s letter to Sergeant Smith and a proper, signed statement made by Tristan Robertson both of which had portions blacked out. I asked McDonald if the blacked out portions were about me and he said “No”  A few weeks later I asked him what the blacked out portions were about. He gave me the gist of them (he’d already forgotten his earlier lie that they weren’t about me) and then said to me, ‘If you let me do a search of your property for a rifle I’ll give you uncensored copies.’ I replied ok and he said he’d come out to my place directly. TWO HOURS later he arrived, without the promised documents, and did his search. This perfunctory “search” was just another example of dishonest police work. He only did it so he could clear Poynter’s “rifle sighting” complaint off his books and “reassure” Poynter (who we all knew had made the whole thing up anyway) that I didn’t have a firearm at my home. I say that McDonald didn’t believe Poynter’s rifle accusations because if he had believed Poynter and Robertson’s fabrications he would not have asked for my permission to do a search, he would have obtained a search warrant and executed it. Have you ever heard of anything as ludicrous as a cop giving a TWO hour warning to a suspect that he was about to search his address for something illegal?

*

.